As much as there is want for all the violence, chaos, and oppression to just immediately go away, hence, don't say anything further that might lay one more drop on the pile, it turns out that other folks have already started pulling back the covers on what they sense might, be in the bag of possibilities. Holdback and silence, efforts to strike the best balance between silence for peace, providing news for peace, and exposing real truth along with bringing up more extreme possibilities based on what may seem apparent, always plays out in an awkward result.

If each day, hundreds of lives are lost, while news sites calculate, when to speak, it can be risky business and heavy burden.

One of the issues that has been brought up by video producers, is the concern about whether there is a concurrent unannounced theme that debilitating Iran could make it easier for Iran or parts of it to become parts of Israel, at some point.

For example, the video here, https://youtube.com/shorts/Ai0-Fm4vZHI?si=ILiaRJ0sHsMlI_KM

While it may look like it is shedding a negative light on military operations in the region, ie upon Iran, that may not necessarily be the case, as, as evident, Iran is in the region not too far from today's geopolitical border of today's (recognized by UN and other entities that involve collaboration of nations) Israel, and there are historical views of the longstanding or nearly timeless concepts of Israel, understood and appreciated by many walks and ways of life, including Islam.

While the current government figures of today's Israel may hold political viewpoints, they can also tell you, that over hundreds of years, thousands of years, the shape of Israel in terms of geo-borders, and the dynamics inside, such as has it always been just a two-state conundrum, or 3 state, or 4 state, or neighboring empires involved in overlaps, etc?

In much the same way, what might the future hold, a hundred years from now, or 300 years from now? What will be the shapes, conditions of people's minds, and their understanding of 'Israel'?

Honestly, by that time, there will probably be communities of individuals living in outer space, such as in space stations, while there might be a flag on the spaceships representing corresponding land masses back on earth.

Significance. The mind. And other intangible aspects of man, can affect how we live in tangible aspects.

Realities as of Tuesday March 11, 2026:

• It may be the case that over 3000 detonative objects of varying sorts, such as missiles, have been dropped on Iran.
• Lebanon has had detonative devices dropped on them.
• There are reports that over 500 people have died in Lebanon, and over 1200 in Iran, since the main start date of markedly escalated missile firings of around end of month February 2026.

Explosive devices have been dropped on Iran before, and so too Lebanon.

A salient point to keep track of, throughout this sensitive time, is the idea of basically '2 Irans', one principally controlled by the Shia regime, perhaps for easy illustration, the marked start date was from Ayatollah Khomeini in about 1979 on through Khamenei and perhaps his son as of the current; the second Iran, may fall into the 'camp' of everyone else that doesn't want to roll with the aforesaid regime. This may be slightly different than just 'pro Shah' and 'pro Shia', as often seen through media lense at least here in the US back in the 1980s.

So, when the media now, in 2026, says, 'Iran', which one are they talking about?

Convenience in conversation in media hype- honestly it can get obnoxious when it gets sloppy, and mixes the two together, when issues arise over violence done upon the land that has nothing to do with the original story line and substantiation for dropping explosives on the land. Vacillating, might be another description. The original story was to push out a corrupt power base.

Apparently there are or were some Iranians that wanted Americans to performs actions to push out corruption in Iran or the 'Shia in the main regime'. It's not certain whether the overlay of the same people wanted exactly 100% of what transpired.

Ok, so now the timeline is getting more and more complex.

Inserting here, there are many camps, just like many philosophies in any other countries; everyone might be striving to be patriotic, but not all beliefs are the same. 

Two camps regarding Iran, is used in this conversation, for the scope of this conversation.

Here is a progression of what could be, could-be developments, which might be explained by use of tiers as a word choice:

Tier 1, was at least the idea that there was, corruption in a regime, in this case, there was a concurring among multiple parties that there was or highly probable there was, corruption in a 'mainly Shia regime'; where a Shia regime without corruption, is what it is is, a functioning regime without corruption.

Tier 2- concerns about a regime that has a combination of corruption, and that it might be a potential danger to others in the way of carrying out violence in many different kinds of ways, (not just missiles or nuclear weapons).

   In the list of others who they may be or were endangered, includes today's Israel, and, as various missile strikes have indicated, to other countries or nations in the Middle East as well, some of those other nations are mainly 'Muslim countries'.

Tier 3- the concept of nuclear weapons capability.
   -Frankly, if an opinion can be dropped in here, anything nuclear is starting to move toward a thing of the past; sure, nuclear weapons are dangerous, but so too are cannonballs and bows and arrows. Cannonballs and arrows from bows, can be shot for miles at certain tech levels. But cannon balls and arrows are now seen as obviously in the days of antiquity, and no one is going to introduce a proposal or hold a speech on UN floor in 2026 rambling about the dangers of cannonballs.

   How to develop a bow and arrow can probably be found online now, and any reasonably smart junior high school aged kid can build one.

   Last checked in the past several years, in Japan, schools equip students as young as age 9 with the basics of understanding of some of the concepts of things nuclear. It's not because kids are being taught how to be weapon masterminds from school age, but because it's old tech, just like working a computer screen. Kids all around the world know they need to plug a keyboard into the computer, or use bluetooth technology, whatever, to type instructions into the computer, to affect what appears on the screen. 50 years ago, only a few persons even knew how to type.

   Enough contrast painted, one of the salient questions that automatically crop up, is, is nuclear weapons capability really the issue with Iran? When, the real, or a real issue, is acting responsibly with weapons, any weapons, nuclear or whatever else, and not just Iran, everyone.

Tier 4- the regime. Which regime?

Tier 5- Iran; but which one?

Tier 6- starts moving into the hate to say it and gain a sense of what might be strongly possible, that developments might just start drifting to debilitating Iran, regardless of whether Shia, Sunni, act responsibly or don't act responsibly, corrupt or not corrupt.

Which then leads to, reiterated, where is the set of developments having to do with detonations being dropped on Iran, and Lebanon, and potentialities at least discussed of boots on the ground, headed to?

Where is it going?, and where do different people, groups, gangs, and other furtive collaborations (or think they're sneaky), trying to go?

The questions continue; if someone or 'someones' is trying to go to or get to a place, none of which has been talked about on policy pulpits, other that what's been or being talked about, why are they trying to get there?, what's their next phase and plan? Build a gigantic circus for decadent acts, with performers in purple polkadotted shorts running around?


Unfortunately, among a large part of media stories, and renown motor-mouths are expressing their hyped up positions about theoretical developments having to do with Iran and the Middle East, a large part of what's being and has been spoken so far, have very little to do with reality. Why is that? 

The answer is people are planning weird stuff. Planning funding games, of course at the expense of innocent lives.


Contrary to certain types of propaganda, not everyone in the US agreed with the simplified idea of bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima roughly 80 years ago. That means not everyone in the government, nor military, nor citizens, nor the aspects of the plan. 

It might all be coming to a head real soon, and someone might have to draw a circle around the mashup spot where a lot of it meets up at, before Pandora's box releases a bunch of confusion.

There were some folks that came to the US back about the 1940s, especially WWI and WWII era, that were impactful in certain ways in developments that reference bomb development.

Some of those folks are from the very same region or close enough to, where some suspected activities mixed up in Epstein files are, 50 and 60 some odd years later.

Polish leadership is expressing disapproval at some of the plausible possibilities of the Epstein case.

Epstein case latter phase investigations, has some overlaps in the time, or is about concurrent to missiles dropped on Iran.

Missiles dropped on Iran aren't quite the same method as what happened in Nagasaki and Hiroshima 80 years ago.

Epstein case probably is not the only global level human trafficking involved case that exists.

It's a brass tacks situation, some of the kids that recently passed away have some of the same positive aspects as some of the kids that managed to survive in Japan about 80 years ago.

It may not be all of the story, rarely is something like that is. Pictures posted here, holding back. It may not be necessary.

Just like 80 years ago, political leaders, analysts of military strategies, religious leaders, are watching situations develop, and asking the straightforward questions, are certain moves, and extents of moves, especially of the violence sort, really the best move?

Words for the day, hubris, recklessness, greed, uninsightful while uninsightfully thought to be insightful, and possibly even, self-destructive.

Third entity?

Was it just a matter of time? Or was it almost unavoidable? 
The latter sentence could be put in front of the former.

At this point, March 10th, 2026, there are a number of irons in the fire all at once, that are percolating and simmering. 

In as easy to follow arrangement possible, before further revision, here are some of the major issues. Some information gleaned from the Epstein file at the DOJ website is also included, which gives clue to what one of the issues is; keep in mind, given how ever many records there are, what you see included here are just a few scraped off the top.

The situation might be worth making it a bit more transparent in the news, so that more people that can make a difference for the better, are informed.
As it stands now, it might take digging through about a half dozen separate different areas in the news to figure out the situation currently at hand.

Here's a quick, but probably imperfect version of a status as of today:
The big government shutdown ended.
There was some partial funding lapse going on.
There have been some legislation produced and proposed in writing, that is about halfway passed. 
The story circulating is some Democrats are holding up the final passage, for the rationale explained in sentences later below. 
Now are concerns about DHS not being funded to the extent of some wants.
The result of DHS not receiving funds might mean agencies that fall under its umbrella, like TSA, FEMA, Coast Guard, and US Secret Service, might eventually wind up in the situation where some employees are not going to get paid.

That's one spot where the danger could come in at. Going weeks with no money coming in, for some circumstances, it just doesn't work. Gas prices have risen lately, and if agents that protect us in different ways, don't have the funds to gas their cars up to get to work, especially if they aren't driving a government vehicle to work, that means security vulnerabilities.

Understandably, there are some politicians that are worked up and concerned about some of the events or incidents involving ICE, and perhaps even potentialities that there will be more incidents based off the idea of what if the trajectory could continue.

Basically, some proponents of holding up funds for ICE, which could mean holding up funds for DHS, are trying to hold up funds because they have the view that doing so could help reduce the amount of what they predict or feel might happen or continue to happen along the lines of incidents that may have fallen outside the scope of most ideal and celebrated.

What that translates into is, 10s of thousands of illegal immigrants have been addressed over the last six months thereabout. Out of the pool of illegal immigrants, addressed or unaddressed, in general, there have been some flatly unacceptable crimes committed by some of them, and those crimes along with its underlayment of illegally immigrated, had to be addressed, in the effort of minimizing crimes and other dangers. Every once in a while, frequency description might vary, someone may have been affected by ICE action, or they saw something that they were either uncomfortable with or decided to express a discomfort with.

A certain amount of sensitivity and choosing words compassionate, especially in regard to individuals that may have gotten injured, or actions really were not meant for them, is due. However, with limited word choices and time, to get the point across, there's a catch 22 here; some politicians either try to put ice on ICE, to reduce the frequency of incidents causing complaint, while if that's done, there's the possibility of causing palsies with other arms and legs of DHS, which could mean dangers if those other arms and legs are immobilized.

In sum, incidents involving ICE, may not have it that the wisest action is put a damper on all of DHS. 
Darned if you do, darned if you don't, may be as it appears before the political arena set to vote yay or nay. (There might be other solutions.)

Ad verbum of referent, does not single out ICE for cause for funding; furthermore, does slate funding for R&D, and training, where these, markedly training, could be used to train agents to improve in the area of minimizing unideal mishaps.

There's lots of doors that could open in the line of vulnerabilities, when DHS for instance is not in full throttle.
For example:

• Coast Guard halting dangerous drugs from coming into the US.
• Flight and airport security gets diminished.
• Major tornado, hurricane, or mudslide strikes; FEMA needed, and folks can't minister to the emergencies, such as rescue, at least at the level desired

This is all happening while conflict is going on in the Middle East.

There may be individuals out there somewhere, lurking, looking, or awaiting to seize an opportunity of the smallest security vulnerability, to attack the US in some sort of kind of way; who can foretell what all the possibilities are that could exist in the vast amount of different kinds of minds out there?

It is known there was an incident in Austin, Texas about a week and half ago; although there were some unfortunate aspects, such as loss of life of victims, it was fortunate first responders were 'right there' to mitigate the situation.

Now what if first responders aren't right there at an incident, due to manpower being just slightly lower than usual? Instead of one minute to arrive on the scene, it takes first responders 2 minutes. There can be a big difference between 1 and 2 minutes in serious incidents.

Political views aside, who is aligned with who aside, from a science perspective, there may be a looming danger to everyone on earth, in the side-effects of combat activities in the Middle East right through here.

For science comparison, principles of volume and impact, there are the very large detonation devices, like a major bomb, and there is what roughly can be referred to as the aggregate of numerous detonation devices; which as the direction these words are heading are trying to illustrate, the side-effects of both might be at least similar.

For example, if 100 missile strikes leaves the same environmental impact as 1 large bomb, then 500 missile strikes, 1000 missile strikes, could leave the side-effect of several bombs.

Right now in the Middle East, there appears to be, from what has been publicly viewed le thus far, an array of many different kinds of missile hits a certain material. The combination when leaving fumes in the air, foreseeable at some point, something somewhere might bring individuals to the brink of sickness.

In WWI troops had to start wearing gas masks as a part of the gear, due to this very same kind of complexity.

Of course there are done of us that prefer to see as peaceful means possible in the quest for peace, which could preclude conditions getting that bad.

News is news, regardless of how it arrives. 
Maybe there is not always a total comfort with the chain of events that led up to recent events, but denying events can be denying facts, and at some point, facts cannot be overlooked.

There may be a chain of events that goes sort of like, the October 7, 2023 events at the social music festival (in the region of Naqab/Negev/Negeb), then it was the backlash series of events, and Ghazans were left constricted; then backlashes to the backlashes, protests everywhere about oppression or oppressive situations on Ghaza; then there were exchange of weapons firing, Iran, Israel, etc.; whether connected or not connected, massive protests calling for change in Iran in regard leadership posts occurred, en segue, massive crackdowns (on protests) occurred, notably starting around the second week of January 2026.

In the past few days, it is almost unavoidable to be made aware of roughly the activities going on in the Middle East, regarding Iran and other missiles landing in other parts of the Middle East.
(A personal take is some of where some of the missiles landed outside of Iran, when different totalities are assessed, spell out there is/was some drug dealing going on that should have stopped and it did not.)

Despite being in a perceived layer, that one can be a story writer about events after the shot caller's shots are carried out, there still is what the facts are.

Of course just remember, everything that has been allowed to happen, is allowed from the Creator, not just hands of men.

There are two salient events that occurred in as many days over this past weekend, as it pertains to close to home.
1- Three US service members died. There are also reports of others injured.
2- Mass shooting in Texas; leaving several fatalities and over a dozen reported injured.

For both these events, it's important to know that there are many different categories of assailants that commit violent activities. Their mental conditions might not necessarily fall into one or the other camp of sane and insane.

Unfortunately there are going to be people that 'romp around' the US and try to paint a picture of all Americans are in one camp, and Islam is in another. They might shout Allahu Akbar, and statements like that, or have T-shirts and symbols on their person with similar at the time of their attack. Now these days, some of the people that dine in, work in, or even own some social spots, may be Muslim. So what's the attack about? Stereotypes as a basis for extremism does not really fit the situation. 
That's a large part of why extremism is called extremism. When people go to the very furthest stretch of the imagination and try to tie different symbols together, and use violence to make a statement, when the statement makes no sense, it accomplished nothing more than more confusion.

A way that this is made clear, and the point substantiated, are recent 'Shia vs non-Shia' tensions in other parts of the world.
Basically the 'regime' (in Iran) targeted in the past weekend's missile strikes is 'Shia'.
Attacking a place to eat and socialize post year 2000, especially given a huge population of Muslims in the US, does not fall in line with what makes any sense. Reckless acts of terrorism reflect oversimplified mindless holding of a stereotype that all Americans and their social spots are pitted against all of Islam; and maybe even with no regard to recent waves of violence in the 'Shia vs non-Shia' considerations. 

In the case of the weekend's shooting in Austin, there probably was some level of preplanning and surveying on the part of the suspect. (Planning and surveying, even if it was just the awareness of what exists and where process, took a length of time, that probably started well before the weekend's array of missile strikes.)


On the one story to address many things, - that a large number students or girls in a school not too far from the areas of targets in Iran, have perished.

Headlines are emerging with figures like 112 victims.

The total scene, going back years ago on through the present, should have been nonexistent.

There were times in decades past where little steps that people were doing after the Ayatollah Khomeini, (words chosen for reference, sometime after 1979), were assessed and evaluated; who were some of the individuals, characters, people, and so on, that were emerging or would follow Khomeini?

Long story short, there are some that may feel that Khomeini was sort of a pinnacle in certain aspects, and other developments after him, were not as high up on the mountain rungs towards that pinnacle or pinnacles. That eventually there would be some discomfort with the regime if people want to call it that, comprised of 'Ayatollahs' and members of that referent arena, after Khomeini got old. So to put a school in area where it might be in the line of fire, -is it to be questioned? Any amount of study of the area could make one know, or could make it likely one knows it was there. Which brings the entire world now to accountability and questioning before judgement day, should the circumstances as a whole should have been allowed to emerge and exist?

There are other series in deeper and more broadly laid out timelines, such as the entire idea of 2 state Palestine Israel and the foreseeable conflicts that would arise. There is even further back than that, such as it was foretold long ago, over a thousand years ago narrated as to statements made thousands of years ago, there would be strife in the region.

...Then to October 7th festival tumult.

There's dimensions of the length of time Persia has been around. Today's politics and different kinds of weapons of mass destruction are a very tiny segment in the timeline.


This cliche, 'ripple effects'. Not surprised it comes up right through here. Anyhow, what will be the cost of oil in the upcoming days? Who will be enriched in the process? What will be recourses for less expensive oil, who walks off with a bunch of money after many people perish?