Rolling post, comments will be added, post updated throughout the day.

Bulleted points are not in extreme depth or detail, alludes to the idea for gist.

-Vietnam War/ Laos situation repeat.
Nixon, ...reference...there is no war/campaign etc in Laos, but, concurrent or near to that, there were things going on in terms of the US military present there.
At this point, it's not clear whether over several hundred thousand reports of what went on in Laos that still haven't been transcribed about 45 years later is still in that condition, about 5 years after that, now in March 2026.
The intensity of some of the activities/battles, in summary, what happened, is still difficult for the human mind to comprehend.

-While the Holocaust was going on, and while Allied forces conducted the rescue, there was other very intense strife going on in an array of areas of the world, roughly 1943 to 1947- repeat.
What happened, in other regions of the world besides where prison camps were, still haven't made there way to modern day school text books. Advanced college/university material doesn't seem to do much more than touch upon it either.

Today, March 27, 2026, there was a military parade in Myanmar.
Basically the 81st, marking 81 years of defence against Japan.

Next number 82; the 82nd has been seen in news stories on the Internet as at least prospectively slated as involved in 'boots on the ground' for some missions in Iran or area.

Discussion right now-
82nd is one of the best, or at least one of the best the US military has to show, as a historical fact.
Soldiers in 82nd are willing to work for $0 compensation. Sacrifice.
Lately there's been a lot of sloppy, greed implied, back and forth goings on having to do with Iran, and there better not be an attempt to use 82nd soldiers. 'If I see it', 'there's going to be some words'.

It is also known that Iran's' Revolutionary Guard, are some highly trained soldiers.

It looks like a stage has been set for a square off, of the best vs the best, (because nobody else feels like doing it.)

Meanwhile, keep in mind the ultimate idea and goals. In general. Which is peace. 

-While developments concerning Iran have taken news and media hype, limelight, center of attention, the following includes major events going on concurrently:
Myanmar/Burma situation
Russia/Ukraine situation 
Detonative devices dropped on Lebanon
Pakistan/Afghanistan 

It's understood that oil and energy in the financial aspect has been affected by the Iran situation.
Myanmar oil prices went up so high, people are now looking at other options of transportation; caps on the amount of gas people can buy are being set on. In effect, restricting travel, at least for some. (This is while the military parade is going on.)

A few days or so back, the US had Japanese Prime Minister a guest. This after about the 80 year mark after the 2 major bombs were dispensed on Nagasaki and Hiroshima, whereat support was 'reported by news media' being asked for in regard to missions on Iran.

Altogether, regardless of how it got there, and who exactly dispensed detonative devices on Iran in the mission called Epic Fury's, quantity is starting to push thresholds where it's larger and larger fractions that equivocate to the middle 1940s era bombs.

It seems as though if the US doesn't get Japan's approval, then a push for a guilty lanyard could start developing from peace groups, that there are now at least 2 similar sets of events, where the US is said in brief to be behind it. Whether the facts are it's entirely true, can be debatable, such as disagreements within military authority ranks, political divides on issues, etc, just like there are political divides on issues now. Nevertheless, when masses of people, especially when English is not their native language, are quickly given the story, what they are told is, the 'US did it'.

The conversations about sentiments and allegiances, they were over here, now over there, but can't be over there without over here, someone is left out, someone does not care if it does not line up or add up, over here, over there...

What is it about?

What are missions that put thousands of people's lives at risk about, money, politics, power, human trafficked attractive people in your house, access to reactional drugs?

Strait of hormones?, oops spelling, Strait of Hormuz.

'Shape it up', shape up preconditions for war; hold it; at this tim, after over 7000 detonative explosions in Iran, there might be room for asking who is the government, unanimously agreed on by the people of Iran, to represent Iran before other world bodies hat recognize countries, is it a continuum of Ayatollahs?

A new playing field of a warfield of simply Iran vs others interested in fighting,  is not the appropriate calling.

Today, March 2026, it is for the best that each movement, each increment of each movement, each word, each set of legislation, best that it be a refined gold nugget, reviewed, and for the best interest of the US short and long term.

Crash last evening...
Communication may not have been optimal...
Whether TSA lapses in employees affected the incident or not, this kind of incident is what happens when agencies like TSA are not at ideal throttle.
Reports are about 400 TSA employees have basically quit in the past few weeks, over pay...

Lawmakers are going to be under more pressure now more than the past few weeks to develop solutions.

Story at the blog  https://hcn-cache.blogspot.com/2026/03/airport-crash-in-ny-might-serve-as-wake.html

Volatility possibilities a factor in determining what to do next, is very old. This time it has an application in markedly attention catching situation, the current conditions of unrest in the Middle East; summarized by Iran has recently been the subject of a high number of missile strikes, along with other activities, such as missiles landing all over the Middle East, something for years was considered an unheard of possibility in the Muslim and Arab Worlds.

In looking ahead, how ever far that is, is based on that in the past 100 years, there has just about always at some point and area within the Middle East, there has been unrest, there is the likelihood that the trajectory over the next at least decade there will either be unrest of some sort, or there will be reasons for someone not to let themselves let things rest, and feel they have a cause to contribute to unrest.

Gas and oil prices may be susceptible to volatility.
Aspects of economics may be volatile, such as here in the US, or in the Middle East, elsewhere, combinations, or all of the above.

Relations with nations may be volatile, allied and at peace in one dimension, but at odds with the same nations in another. For example, when long-time European allies of the US decide they are uncomfortable with a status of military operations, which could occur for example, after a new political party comes to the hilt of power in a nation in Europe.

The location of oil and energy resources, such as beneath the ground or under water, can be independent of geopolitical borders and of course disputes.

In the case of Iran in particular, there quite possibly is or could be, a series of different parties, entities, groups, political parties, religious followings, and more, that may all try to gain power. So if one political party and ideology gets installed, the immediate future might not be a simple of toy soldiers from days bygone. What is meant by that is the vying for power might not be divided into a simple two, either in power, or another group as option to be in power, one with amenable relations to other nations, in this case relevant to the US of course are relations to the US, and another party with relations not as warm.

Instead, based on the typical payout of Middle East politicals for locales in turmoil, there's usually about a half dozen different groups competing all at the same time, no matter what happens, an ongoing situation.

That's volatility. Just to what extent volatility will occur, can be extremely difficult to predict. But in the end, the prospect of volatility will probably exist for a long time.


Opinion afterword
Different methods of suicide related violence is embedded in some areas of the culture in some areas of the Middle East. Intensified activities in Iran are in an era where suicide bombings is still rife in the Middle East in general. There are recurrent reports of incidents in Nigeria, which is to far west extremes in/of the Middle East, debatable where to draw the end/begin line of the region, but is close enough to the northern African/ Middle East zone to make the point.

It can be readily brought to the forefront of minds among millions of Americans what happened in Beirut in October 1983, when the Marine barracks were affected. Of course there is the wish for no such thing to be repeated, nor of course the chance it could, which could mean, situations or settings that could exist where such an incident could conceivably even be planned, might not be in favor.

There have been several incidents in the US, such Austin, Texas attack, on or about March 2nd, and an attack on a synagogue on or about March 12 over a week ago. Whether fully correlated to developments in Middle East, or claimed, or plausible, the events occured and are hence, in the math, of evaluating the entirety of the landscape of emotional comfort.

Right now, March 2026, thousands of families in the Middle East are deeply emotionally affected from what has been going on in this month of March. 

Youthful soldiers being in a region where being upset emotionally is the atmosphere, might not be the safest, is an assessment based off common sense.

What is and what isn't uncertain or eerie might have differing opinions.
Here are a few buzz words and in the news now:

Japan PM slated for a presence in DC.

FYI, through here regarded is the 80th year after the bombings of Nagasaki and Hiroshima.

Americas Counter Cartel Coalition in the news.

More of Iran's top commanders or former top, (or somewhere in a grade between given the circumstance), have been reported recently deceased, the result of actions taken upon Iran that are markedly salient.

Details of what is happening in Iran day today right through here seem to be minimally available in terms of media coverage to aspects of the public.

It's remindful of what happened in Bosnia about 3 decades ago.
It's also remindful of what has happened in Ukraine in about the last 3 years.
Referring to lights off, global communication tools about off. People left in the dark. People have the tight go know what's going on, in general, doesn't have to be detailed minutia, but what is going on with their tax dollars, and how are they (the people, are) being represented.

Sometimes there may be a level of safely assuming the best things are happening and trust is placed, but there's a balancing act, the concern that there could be breaches of the guarantee, that some individuals, such as boots on the ground, didn't lead a troop into doing something absurd, outside the boundary of the mission and permission.

...

Surely there are those of us in the US that want nothing close to the sort of what US Secretary of State John Kerry had to go through in terms of controversy having to do with war.




///
Update today [no 'to day', too day, 2 day, or any other foolishness/misspellings hidden helpers want to throw in here to meddle with messages of this website] March 19, 2026 @ 12pm EST:
Oil fields and energy targets, in the Middle East, seem to be in the limelight and main points of contention in terms of prospective detonative aerial strikes. Just what exactly has and has not been struck, may have to await 100% verification.

There is some level of obviousness here, where strikes on oil and energy fields could have the ramification of raises in oil and energy prices, which begs the question, what is this all really about?

As much as there is want for all the violence, chaos, and oppression to just immediately go away, hence, don't say anything further that might lay one more drop on the pile, it turns out that other folks have already started pulling back the covers on what they sense might, be in the bag of possibilities. Holdback and silence, efforts to strike the best balance between silence for peace, providing news for peace, and exposing real truth along with bringing up more extreme possibilities based on what may seem apparent, always plays out in an awkward result.

If each day, hundreds of lives are lost, while news sites calculate, when to speak, it can be risky business and heavy burden.

One of the issues that has been brought up by video producers, is the concern about whether there is a concurrent unannounced theme that debilitating Iran could make it easier for Iran or parts of it to become parts of Israel, at some point.

For example, the video here, https://youtube.com/shorts/Ai0-Fm4vZHI?si=ILiaRJ0sHsMlI_KM

While it may look like it is shedding a negative light on military operations in the region, ie upon Iran, that may not necessarily be the case, as, as evident, Iran is in the region not too far from today's geopolitical border of today's (recognized by UN and other entities that involve collaboration of nations) Israel, and there are historical views of the longstanding or nearly timeless concepts of Israel, understood and appreciated by many walks and ways of life, including Islam.

While the current government figures of today's Israel may hold political viewpoints, they can also tell you, that over hundreds of years, thousands of years, the shape of Israel in terms of geo-borders, and the dynamics inside, such as has it always been just a two-state conundrum, or 3 state, or 4 state, or neighboring empires involved in overlaps, etc?

In much the same way, what might the future hold, a hundred years from now, or 300 years from now? What will be the shapes, conditions of people's minds, and their understanding of 'Israel'?

Honestly, by that time, there will probably be communities of individuals living in outer space, such as in space stations, while there might be a flag on the spaceships representing corresponding land masses back on earth.

Significance. The mind. And other intangible aspects of man, can affect how we live in tangible aspects.

Realities as of Tuesday March 11, 2026:

• It may be the case that over 3000 detonative objects of varying sorts, such as missiles, have been dropped on Iran.
• Lebanon has had detonative devices dropped on them.
• There are reports that over 500 people have died in Lebanon, and over 1200 in Iran, since the main start date of markedly escalated missile firings of around end of month February 2026.

Explosive devices have been dropped on Iran before, and so too Lebanon.

A salient point to keep track of, throughout this sensitive time, is the idea of basically '2 Irans', one principally controlled by the Shia regime, perhaps for easy illustration, the marked start date was from Ayatollah Khomeini in about 1979 on through Khamenei and perhaps his son as of the current; the second Iran, may fall into the 'camp' of everyone else that doesn't want to roll with the aforesaid regime. This may be slightly different than just 'pro Shah' and 'pro Shia', as often seen through media lense at least here in the US back in the 1980s.

So, when the media now, in 2026, says, 'Iran', which one are they talking about?

Convenience in conversation in media hype- honestly it can get obnoxious when it gets sloppy, and mixes the two together, when issues arise over violence done upon the land that has nothing to do with the original story line and substantiation for dropping explosives on the land. Vacillating, might be another description. The original story was to push out a corrupt power base.

Apparently there are or were some Iranians that wanted Americans to performs actions to push out corruption in Iran or the 'Shia in the main regime'. It's not certain whether the overlay of the same people wanted exactly 100% of what transpired.

Ok, so now the timeline is getting more and more complex.

Inserting here, there are many camps, just like many philosophies in any other countries; everyone might be striving to be patriotic, but not all beliefs are the same. 

Two camps regarding Iran, is used in this conversation, for the scope of this conversation.

Here is a progression of what could be, could-be developments, which might be explained by use of tiers as a word choice:

Tier 1, was at least the idea that there was, corruption in a regime, in this case, there was a concurring among multiple parties that there was or highly probable there was, corruption in a 'mainly Shia regime'; where a Shia regime without corruption, is what it is is, a functioning regime without corruption.

Tier 2- concerns about a regime that has a combination of corruption, and that it might be a potential danger to others in the way of carrying out violence in many different kinds of ways, (not just missiles or nuclear weapons).

   In the list of others who they may be or were endangered, includes today's Israel, and, as various missile strikes have indicated, to other countries or nations in the Middle East as well, some of those other nations are mainly 'Muslim countries'.

Tier 3- the concept of nuclear weapons capability.
   -Frankly, if an opinion can be dropped in here, anything nuclear is starting to move toward a thing of the past; sure, nuclear weapons are dangerous, but so too are cannonballs and bows and arrows. Cannonballs and arrows from bows, can be shot for miles at certain tech levels. But cannon balls and arrows are now seen as obviously in the days of antiquity, and no one is going to introduce a proposal or hold a speech on UN floor in 2026 rambling about the dangers of cannonballs.

   How to develop a bow and arrow can probably be found online now, and any reasonably smart junior high school aged kid can build one.

   Last checked in the past several years, in Japan, schools equip students as young as age 9 with the basics of understanding of some of the concepts of things nuclear. It's not because kids are being taught how to be weapon masterminds from school age, but because it's old tech, just like working a computer screen. Kids all around the world know they need to plug a keyboard into the computer, or use bluetooth technology, whatever, to type instructions into the computer, to affect what appears on the screen. 50 years ago, only a few persons even knew how to type.

   Enough contrast painted, one of the salient questions that automatically crop up, is, is nuclear weapons capability really the issue with Iran? When, the real, or a real issue, is acting responsibly with weapons, any weapons, nuclear or whatever else, and not just Iran, everyone.

Tier 4- the regime. Which regime?

Tier 5- Iran; but which one?

Tier 6- starts moving into the hate to say it and gain a sense of what might be strongly possible, that developments might just start drifting to debilitating Iran, regardless of whether Shia, Sunni, act responsibly or don't act responsibly, corrupt or not corrupt.

Which then leads to, reiterated, where is the set of developments having to do with detonations being dropped on Iran, and Lebanon, and potentialities at least discussed of boots on the ground, headed to?

Where is it going?, and where do different people, groups, gangs, and other furtive collaborations (or think they're sneaky), trying to go?

The questions continue; if someone or 'someones' is trying to go to or get to a place, none of which has been talked about on policy pulpits, other that what's been or being talked about, why are they trying to get there?, what's their next phase and plan? Build a gigantic circus for decadent acts, with performers in purple polkadotted shorts running around?


Unfortunately, among a large part of media stories, and renown motor-mouths are expressing their hyped up positions about theoretical developments having to do with Iran and the Middle East, a large part of what's being and has been spoken so far, have very little to do with reality. Why is that? 

The answer is people are planning weird stuff. Planning funding games, of course at the expense of innocent lives.


Contrary to certain types of propaganda, not everyone in the US agreed with the simplified idea of bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima roughly 80 years ago. That means not everyone in the government, nor military, nor citizens, nor the aspects of the plan. 

It might all be coming to a head real soon, and someone might have to draw a circle around the mashup spot where a lot of it meets up at, before Pandora's box releases a bunch of confusion.

There were some folks that came to the US back about the 1940s, especially WWI and WWII era, that were impactful in certain ways in developments that reference bomb development.

Some of those folks are from the very same region or close enough to, where some suspected activities mixed up in Epstein files are, 50 and 60 some odd years later.

Polish leadership is expressing disapproval at some of the plausible possibilities of the Epstein case.

Epstein case latter phase investigations, has some overlaps in the time, or is about concurrent to missiles dropped on Iran.

Missiles dropped on Iran aren't quite the same method as what happened in Nagasaki and Hiroshima 80 years ago.

Epstein case probably is not the only global level human trafficking involved case that exists.

It's a brass tacks situation, some of the kids that recently passed away have some of the same positive aspects as some of the kids that managed to survive in Japan about 80 years ago.

It may not be all of the story, rarely is something like that is. Pictures posted here, holding back. It may not be necessary.

Just like 80 years ago, political leaders, analysts of military strategies, religious leaders, are watching situations develop, and asking the straightforward questions, are certain moves, and extents of moves, especially of the violence sort, really the best move?

Words for the day, hubris, recklessness, greed, uninsightful while uninsightfully thought to be insightful, and possibly even, self-destructive.

Third entity?