It is very unfortunate that an individual that served in Department of Homeland Security, has succumbed to assault.

In terms of delivering the news straight, the facts are the facts.

Reports for sure, are multiple attacks in the Atlanta area Monday.

Some say a string of attacks, which may have finalized with the attack on Bullis while walking her dog.

The suspect is reported to have had military service.

Even though there may be uproar about past Biden strategies respective to Trump administration efforts in the framework of immigration, there may be some counterbalancing in terms of holding responsibility for individuals who may have the proclivity for engaging in crime, and had immigration issues, when, they have gone through vetting and screening, for military service.

It may be there were aspects of premeditated assault. Said employee was walking dog in early hours, a time where she might have been more vulnerable compared to other times, such as at work in the middle of the day surrounded by armed colleagues.

Hence, question is asked, why then? And if there is a possibility of why then, the suspect probably became familiar with some of her ways, such as through prior observation, or information by someone that has the observations.

What may have immediately struck as in the same sort, was last week's or thereabout, situation, where a woman in Ft Myers Florida was attacked, (hammer, gas station), by a person with similar descriptions.

Issues of immigration may exist. There are other issues. A large one is mental health; there are immigrants on the bubble of dangerous and helpful, that are on the bubble of being allowed to stay in the US or have to leave, where they should receive a few more rounds of inquiry into their health. 

The US military and other securitizing methods, have used immigrants and those with other statuses in the past. It wasn't but a few years, maybe not even days, after WWII, that the US invited scientists that may have served in positions in conflict to the Allies, to help build up certain types of programs, like for outer space.

Just because their name may have been associated with Nazi, accountability for behavior on an individual by individual basis, is the bottom line. Label goes aside. Demonstrated behavior is what counts.

Cries occur when a negative event occurs. It's natural and understandable.

Another area of issues, very very softly, may be aspects of the US, especially Continental, that have received more or less attention from the White House, especially in terms of geographic locations, often which overlay certain socioeconomic conditions.

For example western breadbasket states where income might not be extremely broken, but it is in the zone less than average, towards but not yet mediocre. 
Their visits from the White House? Economic programs? How many visits, length, scope, breadth of issues discussed, etc ?

Who's woes are being heard is being paid attention to right through here, especially with detonative campaigns going on.

There may be, still, dirt roads and no to very little street lights, in certain areas that were slow to rebound from the Reconstruction era, on the borders with suburbs and less populated areas, perhaps Tennessee, Louisiana, Arkansas, central areas of the states. The just asked question might also apply here.

This is not to say they haven't gotten visited, it's painting the general picture. Those folks day-to-day challenges are not national headlines very often.

Lastly, which it's hated to say, but in terms of bloodlines, demographics, ethnicity issues, genus omne, the two incidents mentioned here in, is not doing a service to individuals that meet that description. 

As laws for no discrimination and racial profiling keep rolling out, why stomp on one's own foot toward larger progress by engaging in activities that leave indelible marks?

Afterword (words that 'shouldn't be said')
Referent crimes are so egregious, that while reflections on times such as 1965 when George Wallace blocked students from entering University of Alabama are recalled as efforts to continue to make access to education available, it brings up the questions as to the rationale of the blocking, was it because of incidents like the referent two? At this point, there are many peaceful African Americans, Afro Caribbean, African descriptions, that might be more upset at what's going on, and vehemently opposed to laxity in measures to protect everyone else, than everyone else.

Solutions are needed now. Solutions now. Constructive, peaceful, effective solutions.