Paving the Way for Lower and Lower Standards of Morality and Increased Debauchery
Posted by HCN on Thursday, February 26, 2026
[___]
The first line above is purposely left blank. What would answer the question, what could pave the way for lower standards of morality and Increased debauchery? There are a number of thoughts that can come to mind, the general spirit of what the answer is, etc.
Importantly, while crystallizing what those things are, is identifying solutions to a rapidly surging and growing problem. Especially in the US.
Due to that today's present condition is rife with misunderstanding and misinformation, in sum, some people just don't know...
lay out some of the components of the situation at hand, now in 2026.
Component 1- Right from wrong. Preferred behavior, thoughts, intentions, actions, 'in the eyes of 'the Lord's, the 'Creator' and titles of that ilk; preferred over what is forbidden, disdained, disliked, and unpreffered. That said, maybe the actual component #1 is, what is right, wrong, lawful and unlawful, in the Lord's book and US law, and ones that are both.
For the sake of time, generally, most people have a rough cut idea, even if they aren't religious, what is right and what is wrong, or where to find it, especially the big and simple things, like, do not steal, do not lie.
There is stop right there junction,- Lord's law, and US law. For a long time, the idea of law of the land or government was so that it was in sync with Lord's law.
It seems that, that's changing, at faster rate for the worst. It is as though everyday, people are manipulating or attempting to manipulate longstanding US law, to try to form up new laws that are far removed from the old ones, moreover, that puts the Country on the course of, increased debauchery.
What those manipulators are doing, are paving the way for lower US law standards.
There are a bunch of words that can refer to what's being talked about here. In regards to debauchery, referred to are all the words covering turpitude, indecency, immoral, perversion, lechery, salacity, and promiscuity. Defining each if those words could be component two. There are more words, but will be refrained from due to multiple meanings, time and webspace.
Does Bartholomew really have to be cited? Do individuals that went through trials farther or more severe than known humans at this time can contend with, before they would be worthy of service at high stations, need to be gone into. Most of those folks were already of very high degree (of elevation, piety, etc.).
Let's make it real simple. Respectfully. If the devil approached an adult you get than the middle age, but older than a teenager, say about 27 years old, and said, please go rob the little old blind lady down the street, would you, he, she do I? Probably not.
Next challenge level, what if the individual was told, go rob the old lady, and I'll give you $1000, you'll be made famous and popular. Would you do it, or is the individual if anywhere near same, do it?
This is not an extreme circumstance if Robin Hood stealing from the rich for the poor, or an emergency to save another old lady in the hospital, this is an if everything else reasonably in good standing, in an isolated situation scenario.
A third level of complexity, what if the individual is told, rob the old lady, film yourself doing it, send the film elsewhere, just have trust, no one such as your parents and teachers at school will ever know about it, and you will be granted admission to an elite club of people with access to all the regular voices like drugs and s word you wish, and, you will get $2000 to do it instead of just $1000.
At that extreme of silliness, it's readily understood that for a healthy person to turn to robbing an old lady, and glorifying it with a video, is wrong.
The essential core concept is the same, that involve some of the cases going around the US over about the past year or two, on through as we speak.
It has to stop. Now.
Since when do 14 year olds, take pornographic films of themselves? Not even under pressure of gunpoint, coercion, or abuse, but simply because they think it's 'cool', 'cute', 'in style', or someone offered them some money.
News has become public that there are technically minors, as in under 16 or 18 years old, depending on the region, that are doing unthinkable things, that adults twice that age would never consider, even ones 'not religious'.
Teenagers around the age of 14 that is known, nevermind what isn't known to the public and news media, are posting videos, footage, pictures, disgraceful things, of themselves, online, or shared some kind of way, maybe through social media, or a secret recording for sale to people that have access to it.
Those teenagers are old enough to know that what they are doing they should not be doing.
Here comes what some people think takes the place of basic morality.
An individual tells a teenager, send videos, and they won't tell anybody. The teenager sends the video, and the person breaks the promise and either tells or threatens to tell others. At that, the person tells the teenager, they will let everybody know about, like parents and teachers, unless the teenager pays a sum of money.
So now the teenager is being extorted.
Who gets in trouble these days, in the US (today)? Typically no one but the extortionist.
The parents (enough of them to make a point,) don't even care about their teenagers' behavior; it's more important that the extortionist be caught.
Indecent activity, it goes unaddressed. Trafficking and producing indent material, gone unaddressed.
What this discussion is about, is the focus on making this legal issue, the law of the land, on the extortion for exposure of doings without addressing the lost compass of morality, to the extent that it's starting to develop a generation of youths that think doing activities like filming pien if themselves and selling it, us an okay thing to do.
If the standard at least in the Country's eyes does not firm up, what might be the next less lower standard of morality in the generation after them?
This sounds like where this is all going, are debates over public nudity among adults and children, as letting loose to the point that in the future, the 'expectation', is for adults and children to be walking around holding hands in the distance areas of government, eating, and malls, in the nude. People with just a pair of shorts on are doing too much, and seen as strange, ad become condemned.
There are other situations that arose. You tell me before it's said, it's not worth bringing up or writing about it. If it is brought up, then it's an embarrassment to the Country and its institutions, which can put the blog writer on the less desirable.
Since when do grown, over 18 years old, adults, in government uniforms, be let to roam scot-free when they engaged in acts of debauchery, because someone told them if they did not do it they might lose their job? It doesn't add up.
And if it keeps going, there'll be nothing substantive to make a judgement out of.
Key takeaway: regardless if there's cat-fishing, 'sextortion, extortion involved, everybody involved needs to be at n in par level, and that does not mean make new laws that let the situation go unabated.
The first line above is purposely left blank. What would answer the question, what could pave the way for lower standards of morality and Increased debauchery? There are a number of thoughts that can come to mind, the general spirit of what the answer is, etc.
Importantly, while crystallizing what those things are, is identifying solutions to a rapidly surging and growing problem. Especially in the US.
Due to that today's present condition is rife with misunderstanding and misinformation, in sum, some people just don't know...
lay out some of the components of the situation at hand, now in 2026.
Component 1- Right from wrong. Preferred behavior, thoughts, intentions, actions, 'in the eyes of 'the Lord's, the 'Creator' and titles of that ilk; preferred over what is forbidden, disdained, disliked, and unpreffered. That said, maybe the actual component #1 is, what is right, wrong, lawful and unlawful, in the Lord's book and US law, and ones that are both.
For the sake of time, generally, most people have a rough cut idea, even if they aren't religious, what is right and what is wrong, or where to find it, especially the big and simple things, like, do not steal, do not lie.
There is stop right there junction,- Lord's law, and US law. For a long time, the idea of law of the land or government was so that it was in sync with Lord's law.
It seems that, that's changing, at faster rate for the worst. It is as though everyday, people are manipulating or attempting to manipulate longstanding US law, to try to form up new laws that are far removed from the old ones, moreover, that puts the Country on the course of, increased debauchery.
What those manipulators are doing, are paving the way for lower US law standards.
There are a bunch of words that can refer to what's being talked about here. In regards to debauchery, referred to are all the words covering turpitude, indecency, immoral, perversion, lechery, salacity, and promiscuity. Defining each if those words could be component two. There are more words, but will be refrained from due to multiple meanings, time and webspace.
Does Bartholomew really have to be cited? Do individuals that went through trials farther or more severe than known humans at this time can contend with, before they would be worthy of service at high stations, need to be gone into. Most of those folks were already of very high degree (of elevation, piety, etc.).
Let's make it real simple. Respectfully. If the devil approached an adult you get than the middle age, but older than a teenager, say about 27 years old, and said, please go rob the little old blind lady down the street, would you, he, she do I? Probably not.
Next challenge level, what if the individual was told, go rob the old lady, and I'll give you $1000, you'll be made famous and popular. Would you do it, or is the individual if anywhere near same, do it?
This is not an extreme circumstance if Robin Hood stealing from the rich for the poor, or an emergency to save another old lady in the hospital, this is an if everything else reasonably in good standing, in an isolated situation scenario.
A third level of complexity, what if the individual is told, rob the old lady, film yourself doing it, send the film elsewhere, just have trust, no one such as your parents and teachers at school will ever know about it, and you will be granted admission to an elite club of people with access to all the regular voices like drugs and s word you wish, and, you will get $2000 to do it instead of just $1000.
At that extreme of silliness, it's readily understood that for a healthy person to turn to robbing an old lady, and glorifying it with a video, is wrong.
The essential core concept is the same, that involve some of the cases going around the US over about the past year or two, on through as we speak.
It has to stop. Now.
Since when do 14 year olds, take pornographic films of themselves? Not even under pressure of gunpoint, coercion, or abuse, but simply because they think it's 'cool', 'cute', 'in style', or someone offered them some money.
News has become public that there are technically minors, as in under 16 or 18 years old, depending on the region, that are doing unthinkable things, that adults twice that age would never consider, even ones 'not religious'.
Teenagers around the age of 14 that is known, nevermind what isn't known to the public and news media, are posting videos, footage, pictures, disgraceful things, of themselves, online, or shared some kind of way, maybe through social media, or a secret recording for sale to people that have access to it.
Those teenagers are old enough to know that what they are doing they should not be doing.
Here comes what some people think takes the place of basic morality.
An individual tells a teenager, send videos, and they won't tell anybody. The teenager sends the video, and the person breaks the promise and either tells or threatens to tell others. At that, the person tells the teenager, they will let everybody know about, like parents and teachers, unless the teenager pays a sum of money.
So now the teenager is being extorted.
Who gets in trouble these days, in the US (today)? Typically no one but the extortionist.
The parents (enough of them to make a point,) don't even care about their teenagers' behavior; it's more important that the extortionist be caught.
Indecent activity, it goes unaddressed. Trafficking and producing indent material, gone unaddressed.
What this discussion is about, is the focus on making this legal issue, the law of the land, on the extortion for exposure of doings without addressing the lost compass of morality, to the extent that it's starting to develop a generation of youths that think doing activities like filming pien if themselves and selling it, us an okay thing to do.
If the standard at least in the Country's eyes does not firm up, what might be the next less lower standard of morality in the generation after them?
This sounds like where this is all going, are debates over public nudity among adults and children, as letting loose to the point that in the future, the 'expectation', is for adults and children to be walking around holding hands in the distance areas of government, eating, and malls, in the nude. People with just a pair of shorts on are doing too much, and seen as strange, ad become condemned.
There are other situations that arose. You tell me before it's said, it's not worth bringing up or writing about it. If it is brought up, then it's an embarrassment to the Country and its institutions, which can put the blog writer on the less desirable.
Since when do grown, over 18 years old, adults, in government uniforms, be let to roam scot-free when they engaged in acts of debauchery, because someone told them if they did not do it they might lose their job? It doesn't add up.
And if it keeps going, there'll be nothing substantive to make a judgement out of.
Key takeaway: regardless if there's cat-fishing, 'sextortion, extortion involved, everybody involved needs to be at n in par level, and that does not mean make new laws that let the situation go unabated.
