November 9th, 2016

The Tuesday of major voting this November 2016 has it Mister Donald Trump the elected President of the United States.

Ordinarily, since the U.S. had the Declaration of Independence signed, affairs of U.S. government are in one pool, and affairs of Britain in another.  Albeit, this is one world, that goes round, different creatures from different places share in how the world spins and each doings can impact another's.

In consideration of major events that have happened in the timeline of geopolitical events since 1900, for instance East and West Germany, breakup and reunification, World War One, War Two, Japan at one time foe, now a close ally of the U.S. in many ways, both of whom very wealthy economic giants, emergence of economic powers recognized more as developed nations than just 50 years ago, such as India and Saudi Arabia-- well let us start looking at something the bell tolls that some us might be wondering, what kinds of developments is the U.S. going to undergo after this upcoming election, rapidly approaching?  And what impact will Brexit have on the U.S. in the segments from today, Election Day, after Inauguration Day, and the next 4 years?  A big question is, with all of the possibilities coiled up together, what is the picture of the U.S. and the rest of the earth going to look like.

It will be said, there is a difference between interfering with destiny to the point of being out of line with 'heavenly powers', and letting fool-hardiness keep rolling downhill, or escalate, negatives rolling uphill, however you want to look at it, the bottom line is, somebody or some group, or better yet a whole mass and mass of people might lose big, if clean constructive order is not maintained that precludes economic slop that spells out ineffective economic efficiency.

We still do not have all the possibilities on the table yet, as now the whole Brexit move as of today, has to contend with 'prerogative', perhaps in its literal meaning, of the English Crown, Parliament is getting involved with the move.  Why there is a sense that some might be happy with Brexit, --just the mood that some English online papers bring it across-- is another matter, all the ramifications of what happens when the austere rocks and 'dogs', such as of finance in Europe, in a positive way try to make sure every move of everyone over in Europe is right, or done in certain way, the future is yet to be seen what the play out is on many levels whether Brexit happens or does not happen, and possibly -possibly- whether similar behaviors will exist all around pretty much remaining the same whether the EU or Brexit has never existed.


Written November 3rd 2016 E.S.T.

Among the differences in the debate, this goround, both Trump and Mrs. Clinton seemed to show a tone with sobriety consistently throughout compared.  Sobriety referenced is toward Holy Books nuance, very old word and root, meaning for summary sake, keeping oneself under control at deeper levels.

With respect to time, a portion of the debate went to discussing personal attitudes with regard to opposite gender roles, which was not either of the Nominees fault in terms of selection of the questions.  It might just be a trend of the times that television and media seem to focus more on topics such as that, which leaves the question, was too much a percentage of the debate revolving around the subject of what kinds of things were said off the record, perhaps put on the record, but intended to be off the record?

For those of us that read on a lateral level whereat inevitable gleanings of information about the character of people, such as about what could be perceived as private lives of moderators, present themselves, there might be some irony that one of the moderators has seemed to have made it a trademark since the Presidential debate almost a year ago, of interrupting the speakers in an irksome manner.  Does such a person exist, and did that occur?  There is a line between rudeness and being assertive to moderate a program.  Which side of the line?-, will not be spoken about here, instead, let the readers of this write-up decide.

Overall, there was a respectable amount of substantive educated content in the debate, which is a definite plus.

On the subject of the Middle East and Syria:

• The likelihood is very strong, that there are terrorists out there, that bounce around geographically their poles of central activities, moving from one Middle East town to the next.

• There could be terrorist groups lurking within other terrorist groups that we, the U.S. do not know the names of yet, with respect to popular read knowledge in news media.

• A messy situation exists currently, where the U.S. has found ISIS/ISIL/IS an enemy, whereat essentially, ISIS etc, is an en segue, in sequence, terror group to Al Qaeda; even if Al Qaeda gets completely destroyed, then ISIS gets completely destroyed, the most knowledgeable of Islam scholars will tell you, and the U.S. will agree that, there will probably be an an effort by some terrorist group or some terrorist mind to attempt to develop yet another terrorist group, and of course try to hide behind sincere peace loving Muslim populace.  Similar concept with individual terrorists, one terrorist is removed, then another even sneakier tries to take the previous place; one geographic region gets resolved, then a similar problem springs up elsewhere, it could be simply the nature of the world.
• Aleppo, Baghdad, Mosul, you name the place, the place will have a certain time in the history books in chapters about insurgents and fighting various wars, then new chapters will begin, in some circumstances on the superficiality.  The bigger picture, stepping back from the trees to see the forest is an idea here.
  

• With all the messiness of terror cells and groups exchanging rings around a circus, extreme caution as standard agreeable by any military scientist or strategist, has to be taken on simply arming anyone in the Middle East. 

The U.S. cannot be the victim of when one button pops-up and gets hammered down, another button pops-up and you have to race against time to hammer it down before you run out of time, the evil game, when the buttons that are popping up might be painted a different color, or have different names, but they are all coming from the same guy.


History:
Briefly without detail or illustration--

When Afghani Mujahideen got arm help for their mission of independence, were there or were there not some slimy characters that took the weapons and later evolved into terrorist cells such as Al Qaeda?

How many different Kurdish groups, referring to military fighting groups, have evolved over the past 50 years?  Can the average American citizen name all of them off the top of his or head in under 60 seconds?  If they can accomplish that, can they give a brief description of how each splinter group, or outgrowth ramified from the other groups and how they interrelate?  It is a tough task.

The concept of being dragged into wars by shadowy powers in the Eastern Hemisphere, the result of crafty gambits, has dogged and strained America's military for perhaps up to a century.

Crafty gambits on the part of enemies of America and terrorists could include sacrificing their own lives, their own people, their own soldiers, in the effort to lure American troops into fights, then the unethical doings of the traitors that turn and murder American soldiers, the head-hunters for money, the 'businessmen' that want to melt down military vehicles and sell the metal for money, and much more.


Trying to explain to millions of Americans all and every detail of every unethical gambit that every terrorist has done to try to hurt America is tough to do in just an hour.


The U.S. has to be rightly guided, as any nation, as much as possible.

Authored October 7th 4pm to 8pm EST 2016

The hurricane named Matthew in progress right now has undisputed destructive levels and is making its way from south to north.  As of 4pm E.S.T., (four in the evening the time eastern standard time) the Hurricane Matthew is upon Florida especially the coast.  From south to north means Georgia and South Carolina could be regions that undergo affects very soon in the upcoming timeline.  The hurricane active for the past several days has already done damage in the islands south of Florida such as Haiti and the Caribbean.  The fatality number is already nearing 300 (three hundred).  It is advised again, do not wait until the last second to prepare for the possibilities.  Help might be needed from those that have the capacity from areas further off from the path of the storm.

As of 8pm EST, there are several fatalities reported in Florida, mostly older persons, and millions are without electrical power.  Please follow emergency advisories.

What are some of the same old issues?

Let's look at Libya.  As of today September 29th 2016, there is a concern of citizens and foreigners being trapped amid violence in the Benghazi area and as a result they are cut off from food supply.  The scene is persons severely deficient in food intake remindful of Somalia hunger 35 years ago, hunger victims in Bosnia in the early 1990s.
Back in 2011, there were starvation victims in the northern area of Libya near Tunisia.
Generally fighting is fierce off and on in Sirte, recently, past few months. 
Feelings of intervention in conflicts on Libya soil by other nations with wealth sometimes seems to straddle the middleground of abandon them especially if there is nothing in it for us attitude, like sub-Saharan regions, and rush to keep oil related strongholds at maximum running par.  Those times when Libya has not gotten much intervention often spell out sullen woes for those less fortunate, the referent starvation, and squalid conditions.

In Iran, the questions of nuclear capability keep coming up, such as within the last month, just like it has it seems every few months for the last however many decades.

In Egypt, within the past 2 days at the lengthiest, a car bomb exploded in Cairo.  This is not the first time, and as those that keep up with news in Egypt over the past 20 years know, car bombs detonating in Cairo have appeared in news stories a proportional number of times that it is an occurrence known to surface in the region every so often.

In northern Africa, wherein are sub-groups engaging in political tension and ramifying turmoil, who to side with and when to intervene has been a tough decision in many cases for nations outside with the capacity to help.  At what point is it their business and allow them to solve their problems, then the sliding over to, too much has occurred and if intervention does not occur, then other nations [the scenario of how they could be perceived] have been lax in stepping up and being leaders with a sense of responsibility.

Similar questions come up with respect to Afghanistan; including when to Intervene where there are groups within in tensions with each other.  Recently there was another event involving use of violence that affected a set of Afghani troops of some classification, reference an attack in Kunduz about three days ago. 
Another area of concern is when U.S. troops or another nation do attempt to intervene, and perform a strike on an intended target, sometimes civilians not intended become victim; it is a painful situation to all parties involved, and the agonizing puzzle that needs to be solved as to how to successfully thwart terrorist cells and keep clear of innocent civilians at the same time.

In Iraq, U.S. troops have gotten involved with region on a popular level since he Iraq-Kuwait border dispute which seems like it is still a new era, an era of fighting amongst Arabs and in nations heavily populated by Muslim, on a war international in severity level,  now it has been over a quarter of a century.  Today, September 2016, the more recent rationale for sending troops to Iraq is to combat ISIS/ISIL/IS.  There keeps appearing a reason to be in Iraq, which naturally has those that want to take care of our, U.S. troops, ask voiced or not, are they somehow being baited by a intensely in-depth thought-out plan by a perpetrator of some sort lurking in the region of Iraq to bait and lure our soldiers?

This is not a historical outline of all the accounts of starvation in Libya, tensions in Egypt that turned deadly outside offices in Egypt, and so on, it is to daub at the totality of what looks like a cycle of recurring events.  This is what is meant by resiliency; the events keep coming back to an extent, at least some of them as of now.  Unfortunately, the events often result in the uglier side of humankind developments, the starvation from being boxed in for instance, which explains the word usage of resiliency a negative.