A number of fingers are all pointing fingers to the same crux points: what are the weight and gravity of accusations brought against Trump compared to the weight and gravity of the seriousness of what transpired in the Nixon era when troops in or not in Laos.
Briefly, there are reports of millions of bombs dropped by just the US in Laos during the war, tens of thousands of persons are suspected of having died of unexploded ordinance since about then, statistics show tens of thousands of persons dying in the Laotian Civil War which was concurrent to Vietnam War, and an estimate of 50,000 US troops died in Vietnam, before expounding into other nations involved and other missions not popularly known to the public. Those numbers are serious weight and gravity. Rhetoric in the Ukraine, different light. Numbers of casualties are serious due to terrorism, as a recourse in the current to this year to compare, an avenue where the door for a contrast is closed before heading over there, as Trump has pushed for a tremendous fight against terrorism.
Thus far, the presentments of testimonies that have been going on in the impeachment hearings simply beg the question, -and it is almost as if there is some begging going on, is the launch of the impeachment really about an effort to move women into positions in power, whereat, there are plenty of women that have worked very hard and deservingly have attained higher goals without what may be perceived as shadowy surreptitiousness? Economically, there has been less government funding stalemates,- is the next move by those that are in the system working against the system, to facilitate impeachment attempts? Not without, there are patriots in this Country that do not wish for the moral threads to go totally down the tubes, and if recent policy directives did not stop and stoop to cater to these, are there efforts going on to give a breath of air of opportunity for wicked business syndicates that use and abuse minors and those that cannot help themselves, to pick back up?
Impeachment teams in news agencies formed up by only women in an age range bracket who might not be able to whip up a post bachelor degree thesis on the unfolding of the Tet Offensive without any books or the Internet at their fingertips, is seen. What can be interpreted as an indirect and circumlocutive by Yovanovitch earlier today. Granted she has been in the pit, working in diplomatic posts with salient time in service, however, the scope of discussion is the Trump administration [letter A not capitalized for details], which began several years ago, [not 20 years ago]. What would be the extent of the speech had it been constrained to specific examples within the referent several years to current, sits before audiences.  Can it be said it was heading toward vapid of direct points to the matters at hand?, will not be said here, but it can be brought up, otherwise it wouldn't.

Facts easily show, Chairman Schiff is representing the same state, California, that Pelosi represents. Districts are in the area of well known cities.

Information:
Speaker Pelosi, has been present at 'gay pride' parades.
Yovanovitch, has been present at 'gay pride' parades, i.e. in Kiev.
Kiev is a location where one of the sons of Noah is reputed to have settled after stepping off the Ark. [The Kiev that developed, may not have been, had it not been for the turning away from certain behaviors and attitudes, reference those that chose to board the Ark, literal or figurative not mattering, as the story goes.]

When Ambassador Stephens was a victim in Libya, fall of 2012, just over 7 years ago, there were much, much more efforts in the way of bettering and defending the US than just coming from the Foreign Service, to the extent, it is not fair to cite that, going from larger frame of reference and overlaying it in a more contained diameter of reference stemming over Ukraine. One example.

Back in 1986, tensions between Eritrea and Ethiopia were on the table as a lesser known but conflict severe enough to be global news stories, it had not been that long since the segment of the tensions then were an outgrowth in tensions subsumed in Somalia.

The way that Chairman Schiff asked his questions to Yovanovitch today, in the pauses when referencing comments of the President, was that completely non-partisan, unbiased, with no intentions whatsoever to evoke a particular type of response nor for a particular objective?

Just out, over 140 pounds of methamphetamine was found hidden in some car tires in Kansas City. Fears death by bosses in Mexico.
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/crime/article236317798.html

About 10 days ago, 20 people indicted, Kansas City, drug trafficking scheme.
https://fox4kc.com/2019/10/07/20-people-indicted-in-kansas-city-area-drug-trafficking-scheme/

30 indicted in drug ring, US, Mexico, Canada. Oregon was used for location. Cocaine, meth, ecstasy.
https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/30-indicted-alleged-international-drug-trafficking-ring-u-s-mexico-n1050506

Opioids, meth, marijuana, top Iowa drug problems article:
https://www.thegazette.com/subject/news/health/opioids-meth-and-marijuana-top-iowas-drug-problems-20171107

Iowa government study says, opioids might be coming down, but meth coming up:
https://odcp.iowa.gov/news-release-new-iowa-report-cites-changes-drug-trends-responses

Further west, in Oregon, $15 million drug ring involving meth and heroin. Story about 2 weeks ago.
https://www.ktvz.com/news/authorities-mexico-to-oregon-drug-ring-netted-millions/1128260447

Rural Nebraska having challenge with drug overdoses
http://netnebraska.org/article/news/1193116/drug-overdoses-increase-rural-nebraska-lacks-adequate-treatment

June several months ago, Minnesota had 175 drug overdoses in a span of about 2 weeks
https://www.twincities.com/2019/06/06/spike-in-drug-overdoses-has-minnesota-law-enforcement-scrambling-65-in-minneapolis-past-9-days/

Last year, a suit over opioids, South Dakota.
https://www.duluthnewstribune.com/news/4385524-three-south-dakota-indian-tribes-sue-over-opioid-addictions

So why is there this mental imagery of 'kids' born after the tragic 9-11, running around in catonia-like conditions, that can barely see themselves and what they are doing, possibly because they are overloaded with drugs in their system, attacking one another in the middle of the night? Such as the microcosm of the situation. And some people do not like racism, however, being honest, the drug problem is not facing only African Americans, or only Natives on certain reservations, it is affecting a wide range of ethnic and stock backgrounds.

The breadbasket of America needs to fix up fast, what does this mean? Looking back at Westward expansion, pushing Mexico and Mexicans out of the region, marching Natives and American Indians from one set of land to another, mandating reservations, nevermind the bloodshed, all that happened in the history, of what is considered by some, and goes in numerous textbooks, if even put in school books anymore, as a part of what built up the upwardly civilized USA we have today; summarily, the concept that was presented whether true, false, or combination, was to replace savagery with civilized society; if the kids and even adults are going to act like hooligans, nearly demonized from the drug involvement, what is the point?

Written and published Friday September 20th, 8:20pm EST

A number of angles have been cited by U.S. defense authorities that are indicative of Iran supporting proxies in the region, especially in the southwesternly direction of mainland Iran.
Action taken by U.S., respond by sending troops, specifically, to Saudi Arabia, the objective of which is to bolster stability in the region.
The main context is defending Saudi Arabia from air attack projectiles.

Two statements at one time: One, identifying the direction the drones came from might help in getting to the bottom of who exactly is to blame on the drone strike, further details, such as the entire pathway of the drone, from takeoff to finish, would be ideal. Secondly, it is an absurdity to blame Iran without full 100% substantiation, why?,- it is simply contrary to the culture, as a people, as a nation.
Has ever, in the last 75 years, Iran struck Saudi Arabia? At least that the global public is aware of, history books newspapers, TV and media?

What is immediately recognizable, is that pirates in the Gulf region roaming the seas, plausibly, have gained in sophistication, as far as collection of weaponry, parts and materials that could be used for weaponry, and advancing what they build.

What all the sources are of different kinds of metals, polymers, and materials, not limited to mixing compounds from a combination of sources, could not all be listed here. Logic may point to that it may be more convenient for rogue terrorists to access materials closer to the mark of what a terrorist wants, saliently weapons, when they come from other sources of the combat sort. The downfall of regimes such as Saddam Hussein, and Muammar Qhadhafi, in the trickle down ramifications of scrap parts being traded around, changing hands and sold, could eventually land in the hands of vagabond terrorists and pirates.  This is a similar fallout to the evolution of weaponry that is said to have gotten into the hands of terror groups that came to haunt the U.S. after strife in Afghanistan in the 1980s.

The eventuality could be, that pirates and terrorists from no particular country to name, could mimic the weapon building capacity of an established nation, and set the easy to manipulate flight patterns of drones to attempt to mislead as to the source of where it came from.

Natural instincts have bells that toll there, before accepting that there is a situation of an entire established nation outrightly firing a drone on another nation. It really does not matter where the drone landed, an object as such is very close to a declaration of war. A declaration of that sort, especially skipping out so many other steps that build up to that, does not seem to make much sense considering the dynamics in the region.

What concurrently seems to be a logical area to look at, is there was an incident about June 13, 2019, in the Strait of Hormuz area, where a couple of tankers were attacked, and it was difficult to get a clear read on exactly, who did it. This incident around September 15th, 2019, has similarities, -who did it?

Here is a map of the region with some comments:

This past weekend, drones hit the oil facility in Buqayq region of Saudi Arabia.
[There is a story run at https://www.mail.com/news/politics/9396710-trump-us-locked-loaded-response-to-attack-saudis.html#.7518-stage-mostviewed1-4 that in the picture description, seems to have a discrepancy in the spelling of Buqayq, from what most other sources do. It may be a run-off of the AP story at https://www.apnews.com/269744b35e16422fa746b0c1504ceb4f]

Story title, 'Trump: US locked and loaded for response to attack on Saudis'.
It is admirable that Trump is ready to defend Saudi. It is startling that if something in the way of defending takes place, that it might take place. The hope is, that if anything does happen, that it does not happen to a set of people that did not do the drone strike.

Washington Post, longtime renown newspaper, says https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/middle_east/saudi-tv-channel-fire-at-aramco-facility-no-cause-given/2019/09/13/6f419234-d69e-11e9-8924-1db7dac797fb_story.html, 'Yemen’s Houthi rebels launch drones on 2 big Saudi oil sites'.

   "Since the start of the Saudi-led war, Houthi rebels have been using drones in combat. The first appeared to be off-the-shelf, hobby-kit-style drones. Later, versions nearly identical to Iranian models turned up. Iran denies supplying the Houthis with weapons, although the U.N., the West and Gulf Arab nations say Tehran does."

Where were the drones fired from? Well if they were fired from within Iran or Yemen, the drones would have had to have flown about 350 or 500 miles respectively if from the very edge border of Iran or Yemen. So the drones would have had the capacity to have flown that distance, whereat questions are asked, like, is that really a normal drone flight distance; and, go that distance undetected or unobstructed, very difficult considering flight object recognition abilities.

Far case scenario, there is a lot going on in the region over the past 3 days. How many drone strikes were there, exactly? Where did they land? Who fired the drones? Who built the drones? Where did the materials come from to build the drones? All these need to be answered in the assessment, an obvious angle from the public. There may be many more questions, all while of course, time is involved.

When the well remembered shooting at Columbine High School occurred in April 1999, the suspects that fired shots at the Gilroy Garlic Festival one week ago today, in El Paso, Texas yesterday, and in the Oregon District of Dayton, Ohio, in recent hours, were either just about to be born, a newborn, or only a a few years old.
About 13 years after the Columbine incident, in December 2012, there was the Sandy Hook shooting.

One other similarity among many, to events in the last several days to events in the last several years, it was a Sunday evening at the Gilroy Garlic Festival when the shots were fired, and on October 1st 2017, at the Harvest Festival, shots were fired, same day of the week, Sunday, and near the same time, for fact, about a 5 hour difference in time, 10:30pm at Harvest, 5:15pm at Gilroy, the evening.  

We have come a long ways.  We have a long way to go.



This is what was written in the 'red box' reserved for extreme emergencies at the top of our HCN webpage on August 4th 2019, for records: