A number of fingers are all pointing fingers to the same crux points: what are the weight and gravity of accusations brought against Trump compared to the weight and gravity of the seriousness of what transpired in the Nixon era when troops in or not in Laos.
Briefly, there are reports of millions of bombs dropped by just the US in Laos during the war, tens of thousands of persons are suspected of having died of unexploded ordinance since about then, statistics show tens of thousands of persons dying in the Laotian Civil War which was concurrent to Vietnam War, and an estimate of 50,000 US troops died in Vietnam, before expounding into other nations involved and other missions not popularly known to the public. Those numbers are serious weight and gravity. Rhetoric in the Ukraine, different light. Numbers of casualties are serious due to terrorism, as a recourse in the current to this year to compare, an avenue where the door for a contrast is closed before heading over there, as Trump has pushed for a tremendous fight against terrorism.
Thus far, the presentments of testimonies that have been going on in the impeachment hearings simply beg the question, -and it is almost as if there is some begging going on, is the launch of the impeachment really about an effort to move women into positions in power, whereat, there are plenty of women that have worked very hard and deservingly have attained higher goals without what may be perceived as shadowy surreptitiousness? Economically, there has been less government funding stalemates,- is the next move by those that are in the system working against the system, to facilitate impeachment attempts? Not without, there are patriots in this Country that do not wish for the moral threads to go totally down the tubes, and if recent policy directives did not stop and stoop to cater to these, are there efforts going on to give a breath of air of opportunity for wicked business syndicates that use and abuse minors and those that cannot help themselves, to pick back up?
Impeachment teams in news agencies formed up by only women in an age range bracket who might not be able to whip up a post bachelor degree thesis on the unfolding of the Tet Offensive without any books or the Internet at their fingertips, is seen. What can be interpreted as an indirect and circumlocutive by Yovanovitch earlier today. Granted she has been in the pit, working in diplomatic posts with salient time in service, however, the scope of discussion is the Trump administration [letter A not capitalized for details], which began several years ago, [not 20 years ago]. What would be the extent of the speech had it been constrained to specific examples within the referent several years to current, sits before audiences. Can it be said it was heading toward vapid of direct points to the matters at hand?, will not be said here, but it can be brought up, otherwise it wouldn't.
Facts easily show, Chairman Schiff is representing the same state, California, that Pelosi represents. Districts are in the area of well known cities.
Information:
Speaker Pelosi, has been present at 'gay pride' parades.
Yovanovitch, has been present at 'gay pride' parades, i.e. in Kiev.
Kiev is a location where one of the sons of Noah is reputed to have settled after stepping off the Ark. [The Kiev that developed, may not have been, had it not been for the turning away from certain behaviors and attitudes, reference those that chose to board the Ark, literal or figurative not mattering, as the story goes.]
When Ambassador Stephens was a victim in Libya, fall of 2012, just over 7 years ago, there were much, much more efforts in the way of bettering and defending the US than just coming from the Foreign Service, to the extent, it is not fair to cite that, going from larger frame of reference and overlaying it in a more contained diameter of reference stemming over Ukraine. One example.
Back in 1986, tensions between Eritrea and Ethiopia were on the table as a lesser known but conflict severe enough to be global news stories, it had not been that long since the segment of the tensions then were an outgrowth in tensions subsumed in Somalia.
The way that Chairman Schiff asked his questions to Yovanovitch today, in the pauses when referencing comments of the President, was that completely non-partisan, unbiased, with no intentions whatsoever to evoke a particular type of response nor for a particular objective?
-Some sincere, might just say, what is this about?
Posted by HCN.
