Published night September 24, 2022

What happened at LaGuardia Airport earlier this week, although it wound up lightly, can be used as that little warning light, that there is a concern, and measure in regard to airport security.

The week marks less than two weeks after the 21st year after the tragedy of September 11th, a large portion of which took place in New York, and had the element of airplanes in some aspect involved in the large scale incident. 

What may strike the conscience, is a simple 1 plus 1 equals 2, and a voice should at least bring up the general subject in the effort to preclude any further incident, based off the LaGuardia incident and an incident involving a car bomb at a funeral in the State of Washington, Auburn about a month ago, and with reflections of 9-11.

The LaGuardia incident, a source here: https://www.airlive.net/alert-a-car-has-crashed-into-a-jetblue-a320-at-laguardia-airport/

Hey look, numbers of the possible dangers aside, cars, SUVS, motorcycles, you get the drift, cannot be allowed, such as due to security vulnerabilities being breached, to make their way onto a runway, and especially collide or get close to aircraft.


-This is a newspaper intended for all audiences; an effort is being to strike the proper balance of news and information appropriate for the all audiences, while anticipating that numerous news stories and opinions will be released in the upcoming days that will point out the same point with more detail. There is a boilerplate of common sense, of this is what needs to be done as precautions, in the steps before anything beyond that.

Published 9/24/2022 10pm EST

There have been recurrent shouts from a number of sources about the situation of human trafficking in the southeastern part of the US, and the situation is not comprised by Florida all by itself.

For brief illustration's purpose, on a scale of 1 to 10, 10 being the worst, if one were to draw a circle on a piece of paper and color it in, the darker the color, the worse the crime, the circle matching the 10, or human trafficking sometimes being reported out of the region, would be very dark.

What that circle looks like, is what the satellite imagery of perhaps the eye of the storm of Tropical Storm Ian that is predicted to head toward Florida right now. About as ominous among other descriptions left out here that describe a despicable dajjal, to maintain some kind of peaceful tone, 

Respectfully, each creation is what it is in its own right, however, sometimes when something mirrors or is used in an illustration, the equal and opposite reaction principle may leave both sides described about the same.

The storm Ian appears as nothing to take lightly. 24 counties are under state of emergency. The predictions say the storm will arrive to Florida this Thursday, however, waiting until the last moment to prepare might not prudent. In storm world, most often we only know the full extent of what will happen when it actually happens or after. Demolished water towers, building collapse, floods, and chaotic high winds may be in the ingredients of it all. Moreover, the gusts on the fringes of the storm might be felt as far up us Georgia, west as Alabama and so on.

She has an entry in history reference book after book, and of course had a consistent share in the part of history over the last 100. Many came and went in the global setting which Queen Elizabeth II of England had something to do with in some form.
Surely tributes and memoirs of respect that have been produced in recent years will continue.

Published night EST September 3, 2022 

Reports have it there is a surging level of disputation between Greece and Turkey over airspace and occupation of sorts on islands.
Greece and Turkey are geographically close to each other in certain areas, Greece is generally considered west of Turkey, Turkey to east, especially for the larger tracts of land, however there could be some north, south overlaps, regional vagaries of land positioning.

Reports indicate China has a surging level of grievance, perhaps still somewhat latent, at the large amount of money reference $1.1billion arm sales, all held relative, the US gave Taiwan post Pelosi 2022 visit.
Notes: Basically China made decision back in the early going of the Russia 'invasion' on Ukraine to not to augment that mission, not step whichever applies such as somewhere between forward, lateral, in support of it; meanwhile, much of the world is flabbergasted and indignant at the extent and severity of what has occurred throughout the occupation of Russian forces which has consumed the greater part of 2022 thus far. Perhaps the largest two countries in the world Russia and China - right through here, Russia is not overwhelmingly being viewed in a favorable perspective as put by US media in regard to what is going on in Ukraine. Chances are, to lose a friend, principal at stake, may be on the table, where the US is not exactly partying into the night with the Russians, and to lose China might start coming up, unless whatever magic is performed by the powers that be to maintain positive relations otherwise.

Finland clamping down on amounts of Russian tourist visas they are granting; right through here amid Russia-Ukraine tensions.

Over 1300 fatality victims blamed on Pakistan floods over recent months. Assistance efforts underway.

Chile: New constitution is up for possible implementation.

This is a follow-up to the article written last night, South Sudan Embassy Just Got A Bad Rep, A Really Bad Rep. Assault Story in New York. A Discussion About Diplomatic Immunity.
There are recourses for the administration of justice. Just what exactly they are on a practical level, may take a moment or two to collect.
Here are some basic guidelines:

1. First, document the incident the best possible.
2. Second, seek an immunity waiver. (If the suspect is invoking diplomatic immunity to protect himself from continually being in the state of being arrested, that immunity can be taken away by the country that sent him here.) To obtain the waiver, the State Department may have to request it.
3. If the waiver is denied, seek an expulsion of the referent diplomat. (Realize that repercussions may be dangerous to the suspect if he does get sent home, as in sent back to his home country or sending entity, and that it is diplomatic procedure for expulsion to occur in certain situations which are severe, cases less severe than this receives this treatment, and therefore, there might be a probability that the waiver will be granted, allowing the suspect applicable amount of flexibility after having no further immunity.)

What could happen, is an immunity waiver could be requested, if granted, suspect rearrested and, or a warrant for arrest or court appearance be issued, and he brought before US or local court such as the one attached to the police department which he was initially arrested, perhaps with some kind of monitoring given the diplomatic circumstance could occur, tried before such court, punitive actions established, the diplomat could then be terminated from his post, or in some order of that. Lawyers for all sides, prosecutors, NYPD, State Department, likely most of the pertinent parties involved, and swiftly reach a conclusion or best action.

The suspect cannot and does not have to be considered, let to be allowed to continue [being out there free to roam] scot-free with no punitive repercussion.

Detailed notes:
There are some courses of actions that can be taken as set forth by the State Department, here are some excerpts with boldface to provide a general framework:
The term diplomatic immunity is popularly, and erroneously, understood to refer to special protections afforded all employees of foreign governments who are present in the United States as official representatives of their home governments. (Per State Department's Guide to Law Enforcement on Diplomatic and Consular Immunity, 2018).
It should be emphasized that even at its highest level, diplomatic immunity does not exempt diplomatic officers from the obligation of conforming with national and local laws and regulations. Diplomatic immunity is not intended to serve as a license for persons to flout the law and purposely avoid liability for their actions. The purpose of these privileges and immunities is not to benefit individuals but to ensure the efficient and effective performance of their official missions on behalf of their governments. This is a crucial point for law enforcement officers to understand in their dealings with foreign diplomatic and consular personnel. While police officers are obliged, under international customary and treaty law, to recognize the immunity of the envoy, they must not ignore or condone the commission of crimes. As is explained in greater detail below, adherence to police procedures in such cases is often essential in order for the United States to formulate appropriate measures through diplomatic channels to deal with such offenders.

Diplomatic agents enjoy the highest degree of privileges and immunities. They enjoy complete personal inviolability, which means that they may not be handcuffed (except in extraordinary circumstances), arrested, or detained; and neither their property (including vehicles) nor residences may be entered or searched. Diplomatic agents also enjoy complete immunity from the criminal jurisdiction of the host country’s courts and thus cannot be prosecuted no matter how serious the offense unless their immunity is waived by the sending state (see the following discussion).

Waivers
Always keep in mind that privileges and immunities are extended from one country to another in order to permit their respective representatives to perform their duties effectively; in a sense, it may be said the sending countries “own” these privileges and immunities. Therefore, while the individual enjoying such immunities may not waive them, the sending states can, and do. Police authorities should never address the alleged commission of a crime by a person enjoying full criminal immunity with the belief that there is no possibility that a prosecution could result. The U.S. Department of State requests waivers of immunity in every case where the prosecutor advises that, but for the immunity, charges would be pursued. In serious cases, if a waiver is refused, the offender will be expelled from the United States and the U.S. Department of State will request that a warrant be issued and appropriate entries to the National Crime Information Center (NCIC) database be made by the responsible jurisdiction. The seeking of waiver of immunity is handled entirely via diplomatic channels, but effective and informed police work becomes the basis of the prosecutor’s decision and the foundation for the U.S. Department of State’s waiver requests and any subsequent prosecutions or expulsions.
Correct Understanding of Immunity Frequently (and erroneously), immunity is understood to mean pardon, total exoneration, or total release from the responsibility to comply with the law. In actuality, immunity is simply a legal barrier which precludes U.S. courts from exercising jurisdiction over cases against persons who enjoy it and in no way releases such persons from the duty, embodied in international law, to respect the laws and regulations of the United States.

Waiver of Immunity Diplomatic and consular immunity are not intended to benefit the individual; they are intended to benefit the mission of the foreign government or international organization. Thus an individual does not “own” his or her immunity and it may be waived, in whole or in part, by the mission member’s government. The U.S. Department of State will request a waiver of immunity in every case in which the prosecutor advises that he or she would prosecute but for immunity. The U.S. Department of State’s ability to secure such waiver may depend to a large degree on the strength (and documentation) of the case at issue. Similarly, it is of little avail for the U.S. Department of State to secure a waiver of immunity in a particular case, if the case has not been developed with sufficient care and completeness to permit a successful subsequent prosecution. Proper documentation and reporting by law enforcement authorities play a critical role in both of these respects.

Expulsion Procedure
The criminal immunity that foreign diplomatic and some consular personnel enjoy protects them from the normal jurisdiction of the courts with respect to alleged criminal activity. However, in those instances in which a person with immunity is believed to have committed a serious offense (any felony or crime of violence) and the sending country has not acceded to the U.S. Department of State’s request for a waiver of immunity, it is the Department’s policy to require the departure of that individual from the United States. Requiring the departure of a person who enjoys immunity is an extreme diplomatic tool, and it is used only after the most careful consideration to ensure that the United States is not perceived as having acted in an arbitrary, capricious, or prejudiced manner. A high standard of police investigation, records, and reporting in diplomatic incident cases is therefore essential to permit the Department to make the appropriate decision.