Published Sunday evening before dark August 14, 2022 EST

The situation altogether is a serious issue. Armed individuals that appear ready for the front lines of combat in a military raid operation in a foreign war, standing outside the FBI building in Phoenix, Arizona yesterday.

Here are some of the key components of what makes it an issue:
The right to keep and bear arms.
General understanding that protesting with arms can be taken as a threat with firearms; the line in the stand between simply protesting while concurrently having the right to keep and bear arms (in the process of protesting) is extremely thin.
[It may just be a matter of time before the judgment call is made that protesters have gone too far, crossed the line and now are in arrestable offense territory.]
A popular suggestion is to gate the building off.
At that, there may be other locations susceptible to similar events.
Cordoning further off from the FBI office premises may preempt last drifting possibilities or thoughts they might thereof of the events still having memories that loom that unfolded on January 6th 2021 midafternoon at the DC Capitol.
Protestors may have left the immediate scene in Phoenix, but there are no guarantees they won't be coming back.
From an all-around safety standpoint, there are no guarantees that everyone in, were, or will be in possible events in the unforetold future, the protesting crowd, are actually Trump supporters.
Basically, the prudent rule of thumb is, if you see people with guns standing outside, the bottom line is, there are people with guns outside, regardless of their slogans, outfits, who they are standing beside and so forth.

The guns seen with some of the protesters in Phoenix flat out are very dangerous. They are not little old hand-me-down handguns brought from great grandma's house from cowboy days, they are high powered rifles that can gain precise aim and do serious damage if fired.

The scene puts the FBI in a really awkward moment. Perhaps not everyone remembers that the FBI covers a broad range of purview; they are present and put their lives on the line to react to and address major emergencies involving high round number or gun magazine incidents, usage of weapons of mass destruction and so on. Their lives are on the line after events as well, such as after investigating a terror attack, where terrorists might just want to follow them around for years. All to say, it's a tense moment to be standing armed in front of the very same entity that may have saved your life in ways unbeknownst the day before.

An altercation with both sides pointing weapons would be a serious firefight almost unheard of, like an unprecedented battle on US soil. No one wants all that.

The easiest and probably safe to say, smartest move to be made in terms of everyone involved, is to figure out a way to express your view and positions which will not involve use of firearms by anyone.

Based on information in other news sources, the protesters may feel that President Trump is having a certain aspect of post administration 'picked on', and that the FBI which is a federal agency that really sees no political party divide, is being used as a strong-arm for supporters of certain political views and actions to get their way.

On the other hand, there may be those that feel that acquisition of the 'papers', said to be in the Trump property, in this case by FBI, is standard procedure, and so there should be no cause for unrest (by protestors and supporters of a leader or political figure) for a job that would be done regardless of who was President and what the point of political argument is.

Mar-a-Lago. A house. A search warrant.

Lest mistaken, there is a thing called Due Process. Did Trump simply be asked for the papers? Here is where it might be getting sticky; the January 6th riot panel may be a point in a series in a sequence of events, where the search warrant was en segue, or it follows, the developments in the hearings. This encompasses other developments such as meetings and ascertaining of other documents. It may be possible, if the hearings went differently, the method of obtaining documents may have been different. If a search warrant, the method and manner of search and acquisition, had been more amicable, maybe the escalation of events in Phoenix would not have occurred the way it did.

Then again, methodologies are analyzed often very carefully by law enforcement bodies. This is not to say everyone is perfect. It is also to say that there may be a zone where doing a deeper analysis and slowing things down, breaking it up into smaller chunks, discussing and holding topics in hearings that are as substantive as possible, may help placate where all of this either got to or where is going.

Usually, when a raid or seizure occurs it is indicative that the party that held the documents might make an attempt at obstructing their acquisition by federal authorities. Did that happen? That might be one of the crux points why there was a reaction to the raids, that were making a statement that they felt the raid was a disrespectful affront.

That 'usually', may have some elements of folkways, rehearsed procedures again involved, it is a prickly matter.

The President's job, for conversation sake, is not to hoard boxes of sensitive data; for a long time, the beginning of the President institution, President Washington, he had advisors that help him with secret and sensitive data. Thereat, that type of data is to understood to be of some degree already shareable with applicable parties.

Which leaves these closing words, softly, there is too much gun waving going on, and for reasons that could be averted through refined approaches to what is known and unknown, benchmarks already gone through, and untraversed unidentified directions and lays.

Published mid evening August 12, 2022

The following news article gives a lot of information about the background of issues and what is known to the public thus far: https://www.nj.com/news/2022/08/nj-man-charged-with-stabbing-author-salman-rushdie-on-lecture-stage-in-new-york.html.

How did I find out, with nothing in surroundings but electronic equipment and maybe glimpses of the sky? A sort of shimmering of something happened making the news in the Mid-Atlantic region today, but what was it? This event found.

Given all of the resentment and rioting in the past, it seems an inevitable climax of lashing out by someone or some collective against Rushdie was not there in the mix with other recent news information for some years, although there was a sense among many that something like this or at least an attempt thereunto, might emerge someday. 

Some other angles in details and background about today's event:
The day the stabbing event happened had at least a twofold aspect, in today, of one, being Friday, the congregation day that adherents to the way of life established as affirmed by the Seal of the Prophets* recognize and perform certain actions, for example, able males go to Juma' prayer meet and so on. The second aspect is today is nearing or possibly even the middle of the first Hijri, lunar month, known as Muharram, just a few days past the 10th, known as Ashura Day. 

The author of 'Satanic Verses', who wrote about the Seal of the Prophets in ways which were taken as uncomfortable, perhaps very uncomfortable, whereat the 'subject' of the book in the Seal left sayings which discuss the virtues of the 10th, Ashura, of Muharram, (and) at least the fasting in the middle of the Hijri months, and the obligations for Friday, -the author of 'S. Verses' promulgates himself, and hence his literature, which is attached to him, on this day Friday. Whereat, it may be possible, that, that combination did not sit well with everyone, especially adherents to the path practiced by again the Seal of the Prophets.

Another dimension which may not have sat well with adherents is that the legacy, example and so forth of the Seal of the Prophets, whereas perhaps in some view, in a linear timeline, whatever happens for the rest of time after the seal or the seal itself carried by the Seal, and so on, the seal marks that event and there according to the principle will have no other come after him in the applicable aspects, basically, self-explanatory that, that is innate with what it means. So for thus far roughly 1400 years ago, until now, the examples of how to live are still carried on throughout the world, and there will be many more years that it will, and whether people follow the way, do not, forgot, forget, or only have tiny fragments of vestiges and understanding in the centuries in the future, etc., a nearly eternal legacy (of the Seal of the Prophets) is contrasted to Salman Rushdie's 75 years thereabout of living so far, and the 30 something years or so ago he embarked on his 'Satanic Verses' project, which infuriated many adherents.

An aspect that does not sit comfortable with adherents, is Salman Rushdie's continued use of the name, despite what might be a conflict of interest. Explaining, Salman is a name that had a member of the Sahaba, or close surrounding followers and helpers, around the very man Salman Rushdie chose to be the subject of his referent book. Salman Al Farasi or the Persian, the Sahab, singular form, was known to be his name.
The second name, Rushdie, perhaps close to the word Rushd, one of the the words close to Rasheed, Rashid, various transliterations, is one of the '99 Names', or Isma (names) al Husna, briefly translated glorified names, found in Quran, the book that was revealed to the Seal of the Prophets, the man who Salman Rushdie chose to discuss in the manner he did.

Somewhere between further background and further reading:

Among other things, New York has a large Muslim population; a large number of different aspects of teachings and knowledge can be found there; famous translator of the Quran Yusuf Ali, resided or stayed there for a time, where there may be some discrepancies and mild amount of resentment in that original Quran can only be original Quran, but generally, popular consensus is there was not a blaring purposefully antagonistic evil in what Yusuf Ali translating effort was doing. Dr. Rahman a historic figure (who came to America from then India, the region of in East Pakistan) that had both pedigree that is said to be distinguished, and preceptor to preceptor lineage through what is popularly understood to briefly be called the Qadiri chain (of preceptors, guides, or teachers), was a resident of New York for a time as well. Again, contrasts and conflict of interests can be seen by adherents familiar with these and much more where a man in Salman Rushdie said to be from India, that gained access to some knowledges, was discussing the Seal of the Prophets in ways interpreted by adherents as condescending, disrespectful, sacrilegious and other terms in that vein, meanwhile are numerous legacies in the other direction in New York.


The concept of Freedom of Speech, especially here in America, is a national treasure. Albeit, there are some that believe that even though freedom of speech may exist in whatever form or fashion wherever it may be, that certain established principles such as affirming the affirming, for lean words, of exaltation, dignity, and so on, especially of Prophets, remain set, regardless of the freedom of speech laws, and there exist feelings by some that freedom of speech rulings can sometimes be taken to far, or taken advantage of. It is known that words that could be perceived or interpreted as vehemently discomforting or having misportrayals about Prophets could eventually lead to unrest.

Perhaps these sentences above help explain general mindset and views, a languageless understanding, or having no language barrier, why the expressed literature of Salman Rushdie rubbed the wrong way with many throughout the world, and still so even though it has been some decades now, and also explain why those that support promulgating Salman Rushdie's works are felt to be on opposing sides to adherents as  well.

There is a chance that the level of indignancy still felt by adherents of the 'guided way' may have reduced some had Salman Rushdie rescinded his statements, or apologized, or something along those lines; rather his works are still promoted.


Another discussion, is there is something in the Quran, which discusses, the opposite of something is not taken up until one knows the original source, basically, the right way of doing things first. Knowledges and traditions carried on in India, hometown of S. Rushdie, are being 'found again' as we speak. That S. Rushdie may have been limited in scope of his literature is a matter of concern, and that he talked about what he knew about, and talked in a way that was hurtful to many, might encapsulate a rationale by adherents for a general disdain of his literature piece and the effort to continue promoting it.


*'Real' prophets, such as those that were revealed a 'Holy Book'.
Notes: (Seal of the Prophets (sometimes found Khatm) is a title or 'name' of Prophet Muhammad, sala...and peace, partial translation of post name lauds, and also has the practical use of that in that that was an aspect describing him. (reference 'this day perfected...').

Hopefully there is a question mark, that leaves room that dropping and detonation of explosive weapons doesn't become the daily normality in Crimea.
There has been turbulence in the region before.
Reference start of 2014, annexation subject, etc.
Who dropped the explosives earlier this week, which side, chicken before egg, who started it first?, where developments like that predictably go, especially in the region right through here, there is bound to be more, unless of course it is called off.
(Spelling it out, who dropped the first round may not be the concern most pressing with respect to the possibilities in the imminent future.)

Foreseeable is just a huge mess of people running in confusion and millions of dollars in property damage in the upcoming weeks, where the mushroomed framework of strife is expanded to include the areas of Ukraine that have been affected in 2022, plus Crimea, and then there may be possibly more; nearby Georgia has been discussed as in the realm of possibility by US politicians in recent weeks.

Published night, EST, August 10, 2022

At first, words in some ways best left not spoken: If anyone or group of people, even if on a global scale attempt and pull in others to participate to weave the Prophecy and Prophets families into illegal narcotic trades, simply stop.

Not to glorify certain evils, has long standing foundings.

The most vulnerable in recent weeks have come under some of the most grizzly attacks. Today's news in the USA had in about 87% of the headlines unfounded attacks on women and children. From girls found walking along the roadside come to find out decaying bodies are found in the house she escaped from, and too many others to keep track of off the top. 

Rep. Walorski and several other were fatally injured in a car crash earlier today, Wednesday August 3rd.

In Europe, noted especially the UK and Spain, something called 'spiking' has been occurring at a dangerous level of frequency. Essentially the tiny point of needle has been used to stab a number of females at social spots. There may have been substances in them.

Was it to threaten, harm, set the stage for other assaults, spread disease, spread COVID, act as a cover for drug use, a new technique of terrorism?, does not really matter in some ways. Be aware o it, be vigilant, and it may be one more thing security personnel at social events have to watch out for.

In southeastern China, Jiangxi Province, a stabbing rampage at a kindergarten, on, about earlier today.

Argentina Economy Minister announces slating to stop printing money, as a plan to curb inflation.

A town in central Libya, had event earlier this week where a fuel truck flipped over, caught fire and exploded, causing almost a 100 injuries.

Libya Friendship Committee at Turkish Parliament formed, to administer to Libya Turkey relations upon territorial integrity. [More information enabling to provide more information needed.]

Over a 100,000 new COVID cases for several days in a row in South Korea, headlines indicate.

Stories written about Saudi:
-2029 Olympic bid  [unclear]
-OXAGON by NEOM

A drought in Mexico.

In the last 4 months somewhere between 21 and 30 transit drivers, such as for taxis, have been murdered, cars torched, reported to have taken place in Guerrero.

US seeking possession of Venezuelan cargo jet, reference evidently previously owned by entities in Iran that might have ties to terror groups.

It was almost anticipated that the article by Cal Thomas, Cal Thomas: Jill to Joe: It’s over (msn.com), will beg the question, how old is Cal Thomas and how old is Joe Biden, because typically when an article like that comes out, down in the lower strata of the themes and subtleties in the conversation are competitions of sorts between two men about the same age that disagree on varying issues.

To address the age matter, Cal Thomas and President Biden according to information made immediately through Internet web search, were both born toward the end of the year 1942. Biden was born mid November, while Thomas was born within a couple of weeks after that in early December. So Cal Thomas is almost as old as the President, but not quite.

Cal Thomas, the American University educated columnist, also military veteran, and in summary, has stayed up on the news for a long time, shapes a story where the wife of President Biden says certain things about Biden's general judgement with respect to major global affairs, saliently the situation in Ukraine respective the 'Russian Invasion'.

Okay, this is where the continual jiving around by media keeps up and keeps up, a larger media presence than just Cal Thomas.

Within recent weeks, reviewing two photographs that jut out in mind, that may have bearing on today's status of world affairs especially regarding the Ukraine Russia situation, sit prominent, at the same time the photo's in the Cal Thomas referent expression of view.

Respectfully the first, is the photo of Biden when he was Vice President sitting at the White House at the table with then President Barack Obama while national security issues were being discussed. The photo is pretty popular and can easily be found in books and media.

Now comment- wouldn't you think, with all the intelligence capabilities of the US, all the agencies, DHS, military, satellites and more, that folks sitting in the White House at that level would be somewhat if not fully aware there has been constructed sophistry of people control and power involving conflict and tension, between the Ukraine and Russia?; they (Russia and Ukraine, reiterated again) have been going back and forth over issues for at least centuries, perhaps more thousands of years than many historic calendar can keep up with.

At that, there can be lots of yak, while transitioning to the next 'big photo', such as the Chechnya to Russia situation, where Chechnya every now and then has had aspects according to the press, the portion of the carpet where others in Russia wear out stomping and drying their shoes off, before they walk on the comfortable part.

Second big photo, of course as some will expect is said to be of Russia leader's Putin when he was infiltrating Germany, supposedly when he was much younger in intelligence career.

With all that going on, it is believable that the Biden in his advanced tenureship, aware of all that and much more, can see that a few things may eventually topple over the boiling point at some point while Putin is in office, and given the troubles that have been going on inside both Ukraine and Russia, the drug epidemics, the drug trafficking, the human trafficking, the exploitation of women, that at some point, a very uncomfortable time will occur in the Ukraine.

Note, there is a lot that goes into the pot that stirred up the current situation of chaotic doldrum violence in Ukraine to discuss all at once briefly. This is to just hit at the topic, hey, maybe 'stand down' some, when it comes to talking negatively about the President, especially when it comes from someone at the stature of a Cal Thomas, may be appropriate, for a few reasons, and one of those reasons, is others far less knowledgeable than he, may decide to copycat and talk negatively as well. 

The US does not need worthless chatter circulating about our leaders.

Knowledgeable military veterans get all over the Ukraine Russia situation, and may immediately say if not out loud, to themselves, 'not another Vietnam'. They know right away, that a situation is escalating where the US is going to be asked for more and more weaponry (to the Ukraine), which essentially costs more and more money, perhaps indirectly we are being asked that, at a time when the US needs the money, to fight COVID-19, get kids in school, keep in school, and improve the economy. They also know about two conflicting sides in the same region, when in reality, wearing multiple hats, and hat swapping can happen all the time, and some of those hats we might not have full knowledge of. Same deal, different place.

Lyrics in the music in the background, 'somewhere between boots on the ground and causes of the Cold War'.

(HIMARS and howitzers: West helps Ukraine with key weaponry (msn.com)) [Talking loudly, like the Arab himar, donkey, thoughts was there, such as to be sure to watch tome, but no, refers to HIMAR the weapon.]

Speaking of different regions, the US has been grappling with the Middle East for so long, defense is almost left with their pants, part of the way down, when a big development in Europe, which could never conceivable happen today, happens.

Closer to reality be told, surely the heads of the US government knew something was going to unfold in Ukraine, but exactly what is unknown until those shells and ballistics actually release.

The premise and to some degree notion that 100% of what happens to the US rests on the President, currently Biden, and 100% of what happens in Russia rests on the Russian President in this case Putin, is put on the table at an increased magnification right through here. It is obvious that lack of support, and that other higher up decision makers are involved in both nations with what is happening currently.

Cal Thomas, having at least the historic Thomas surname that goes back hundreds or thousands of years to subject matter not to be discussed here in public forum, knows in consistency, that certain behaviors are not in line with what results in a positive health of society, and has in his career made statements about that. It was not always that the styles that swept in referring to behaviors, was anywhere near accepted by the White House. As a matter of fact, for many decades, if certain 'stylish' behaviors were engaged in, going anywhere near the White House and those in it, was unheard of. Times changed. All the surnames in the mix are ancient.

What is best for the nation? That discussion, is a discussion. What has been in place for thousands of years, what the Lord made clear, likely, always.

Nevertheless, there are different issues, and some might be accepted while others might be rejected, and different amounts of each.

The article, by Cal Thomas, has a photo of President Biden in Saudi Arabia recently, at the Security and Development Summit, in 'Jill to Joe..', I'm almost afraid to restate the title, the saying goes, because of planar innuendo. The President was invited onto Saudi soil, where not everyone is, how does that photo all tie in to the point Cal Thomas is trying to make?