Fakery in Media and Political Hype So Rife Inevitably Begs Questions Whether there are Axes to Grind Amidst Turmoil in the Middle East
Posted by HCN on Wednesday, March 11, 2026
As much as there is want for all the violence, chaos, and oppression to just immediately go away, hence, don't say anything further that might lay one more drop on the pile, it turns out that other folks have already started pulling back the covers on what they sense might, be in the bag of possibilities. Holdback and silence, efforts to strike the best balance between silence for peace, providing news for peace, and exposing real truth along with bringing up more extreme possibilities based on what may seem apparent, always plays out in an awkward result.
If each day, hundreds of lives are lost, while news sites calculate, when to speak, it can be risky business and heavy burden.
One of the issues that has been brought up by video producers, is the concern about whether there is a concurrent unannounced theme that debilitating Iran could make it easier for Iran or parts of it to become parts of Israel, at some point.
For example, the video here, https://youtube.com/shorts/Ai0-Fm4vZHI?si=ILiaRJ0sHsMlI_KM
While it may look like it is shedding a negative light on military operations in the region, ie upon Iran, that may not necessarily be the case, as, as evident, Iran is in the region not too far from today's geopolitical border of today's (recognized by UN and other entities that involve collaboration of nations) Israel, and there are historical views of the longstanding or nearly timeless concepts of Israel, understood and appreciated by many walks and ways of life, including Islam.
While the current government figures of today's Israel may hold political viewpoints, they can also tell you, that over hundreds of years, thousands of years, the shape of Israel in terms of geo-borders, and the dynamics inside, such as has it always been just a two-state conundrum, or 3 state, or 4 state, or neighboring empires involved in overlaps, etc?
In much the same way, what might the future hold, a hundred years from now, or 300 years from now? What will be the shapes, conditions of people's minds, and their understanding of 'Israel'?
Honestly, by that time, there will probably be communities of individuals living in outer space, such as in space stations, while there might be a flag on the spaceships representing corresponding land masses back on earth.
Significance. The mind. And other intangible aspects of man, can affect how we live in tangible aspects.
Realities as of Tuesday March 11, 2026:
A salient point to keep track of, throughout this sensitive time, is the idea of basically '2 Irans', one principally controlled by the Shia regime, perhaps for easy illustration, the marked start date was from Ayatollah Khomeini in about 1979 on through Khamenei and perhaps his son as of the current; the second Iran, may fall into the 'camp' of everyone else that doesn't want to roll with the aforesaid regime. This may be slightly different than just 'pro Shah' and 'pro Shia', as often seen through media lense at least here in the US back in the 1980s.
So, when the media now, in 2026, says, 'Iran', which one are they talking about?
Convenience in conversation in media hype- honestly it can get obnoxious when it gets sloppy, and mixes the two together, when issues arise over violence done upon the land that has nothing to do with the original story line and substantiation for dropping explosives on the land. Vacillating, might be another description. The original story was to push out a corrupt power base.
Apparently there are or were some Iranians that wanted Americans to performs actions to push out corruption in Iran or the 'Shia in the main regime'. It's not certain whether the overlay of the same people wanted exactly 100% of what transpired.
Ok, so now the timeline is getting more and more complex.
Inserting here, there are many camps, just like many philosophies in any other countries; everyone might be striving to be patriotic, but not all beliefs are the same.
Two camps regarding Iran, is used in this conversation, for the scope of this conversation.
Here is a progression of what could be, could-be developments, which might be explained by use of tiers as a word choice:
Tier 1, was at least the idea that there was, corruption in a regime, in this case, there was a concurring among multiple parties that there was or highly probable there was, corruption in a 'mainly Shia regime'; where a Shia regime without corruption, is what it is is, a functioning regime without corruption.
Tier 2- concerns about a regime that has a combination of corruption, and that it might be a potential danger to others in the way of carrying out violence in many different kinds of ways, (not just missiles or nuclear weapons).
In the list of others who they may be or were endangered, includes today's Israel, and, as various missile strikes have indicated, to other countries or nations in the Middle East as well, some of those other nations are mainly 'Muslim countries'.
Tier 3- the concept of nuclear weapons capability.
-Frankly, if an opinion can be dropped in here, anything nuclear is starting to move toward a thing of the past; sure, nuclear weapons are dangerous, but so too are cannonballs and bows and arrows. Cannonballs and arrows from bows, can be shot for miles at certain tech levels. But cannon balls and arrows are now seen as obviously in the days of antiquity, and no one is going to introduce a proposal or hold a speech on UN floor in 2026 rambling about the dangers of cannonballs.
How to develop a bow and arrow can probably be found online now, and any reasonably smart junior high school aged kid can build one.
Last checked in the past several years, in Japan, schools equip students as young as age 9 with the basics of understanding of some of the concepts of things nuclear. It's not because kids are being taught how to be weapon masterminds from school age, but because it's old tech, just like working a computer screen. Kids all around the world know they need to plug a keyboard into the computer, or use bluetooth technology, whatever, to type instructions into the computer, to affect what appears on the screen. 50 years ago, only a few persons even knew how to type.
Enough contrast painted, one of the salient questions that automatically crop up, is, is nuclear weapons capability really the issue with Iran? When, the real, or a real issue, is acting responsibly with weapons, any weapons, nuclear or whatever else, and not just Iran, everyone.
Tier 4- the regime. Which regime?
Tier 5- Iran; but which one?
Tier 6- starts moving into the hate to say it and gain a sense of what might be strongly possible, that developments might just start drifting to debilitating Iran, regardless of whether Shia, Sunni, act responsibly or don't act responsibly, corrupt or not corrupt.
Which then leads to, reiterated, where is the set of developments having to do with detonations being dropped on Iran, and Lebanon, and potentialities at least discussed of boots on the ground, headed to?
Where is it going?, and where do different people, groups, gangs, and other furtive collaborations (or think they're sneaky), trying to go?
The questions continue; if someone or 'someones' is trying to go to or get to a place, none of which has been talked about on policy pulpits, other that what's been or being talked about, why are they trying to get there?, what's their next phase and plan? Build a gigantic circus for decadent acts, with performers in purple polkadotted shorts running around?
Unfortunately, among a large part of media stories, and renown motor-mouths are expressing their hyped up positions about theoretical developments having to do with Iran and the Middle East, a large part of what's being and has been spoken so far, have very little to do with reality. Why is that?
The answer is people are planning weird stuff. Planning funding games, of course at the expense of innocent lives.
Contrary to certain types of propaganda, not everyone in the US agreed with the simplified idea of bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima roughly 80 years ago. That means not everyone in the government, nor military, nor citizens, nor the aspects of the plan.
It might all be coming to a head real soon, and someone might have to draw a circle around the mashup spot where a lot of it meets up at, before Pandora's box releases a bunch of confusion.
There were some folks that came to the US back about the 1940s, especially WWI and WWII era, that were impactful in certain ways in developments that reference bomb development.
Some of those folks are from the very same region or close enough to, where some suspected activities mixed up in Epstein files are, 50 and 60 some odd years later.
Polish leadership is expressing disapproval at some of the plausible possibilities of the Epstein case.
Epstein case latter phase investigations, has some overlaps in the time, or is about concurrent to missiles dropped on Iran.
Missiles dropped on Iran aren't quite the same method as what happened in Nagasaki and Hiroshima 80 years ago.
Epstein case probably is not the only global level human trafficking involved case that exists.
It's a brass tacks situation, some of the kids that recently passed away have some of the same positive aspects as some of the kids that managed to survive in Japan about 80 years ago.
It may not be all of the story, rarely is something like that is. Pictures posted here, holding back. It may not be necessary.
Just like 80 years ago, political leaders, analysts of military strategies, religious leaders, are watching situations develop, and asking the straightforward questions, are certain moves, and extents of moves, especially of the violence sort, really the best move?
Words for the day, hubris, recklessness, greed, uninsightful while uninsightfully thought to be insightful, and possibly even, self-destructive.
---
Third entity?
If each day, hundreds of lives are lost, while news sites calculate, when to speak, it can be risky business and heavy burden.
One of the issues that has been brought up by video producers, is the concern about whether there is a concurrent unannounced theme that debilitating Iran could make it easier for Iran or parts of it to become parts of Israel, at some point.
For example, the video here, https://youtube.com/shorts/Ai0-Fm4vZHI?si=ILiaRJ0sHsMlI_KM
While it may look like it is shedding a negative light on military operations in the region, ie upon Iran, that may not necessarily be the case, as, as evident, Iran is in the region not too far from today's geopolitical border of today's (recognized by UN and other entities that involve collaboration of nations) Israel, and there are historical views of the longstanding or nearly timeless concepts of Israel, understood and appreciated by many walks and ways of life, including Islam.
While the current government figures of today's Israel may hold political viewpoints, they can also tell you, that over hundreds of years, thousands of years, the shape of Israel in terms of geo-borders, and the dynamics inside, such as has it always been just a two-state conundrum, or 3 state, or 4 state, or neighboring empires involved in overlaps, etc?
In much the same way, what might the future hold, a hundred years from now, or 300 years from now? What will be the shapes, conditions of people's minds, and their understanding of 'Israel'?
Honestly, by that time, there will probably be communities of individuals living in outer space, such as in space stations, while there might be a flag on the spaceships representing corresponding land masses back on earth.
Significance. The mind. And other intangible aspects of man, can affect how we live in tangible aspects.
Realities as of Tuesday March 11, 2026:
- It may be the case that over 3000 detonative objects of varying sorts, such as missiles, have been dropped on Iran.
- Lebanon has had detonative devices dropped on them.
- There are reports that over 500 people have died in Lebanon, and over 1200 in Iran, since the main start date of markedly escalated missile firings of around end of month February 2026.
A salient point to keep track of, throughout this sensitive time, is the idea of basically '2 Irans', one principally controlled by the Shia regime, perhaps for easy illustration, the marked start date was from Ayatollah Khomeini in about 1979 on through Khamenei and perhaps his son as of the current; the second Iran, may fall into the 'camp' of everyone else that doesn't want to roll with the aforesaid regime. This may be slightly different than just 'pro Shah' and 'pro Shia', as often seen through media lense at least here in the US back in the 1980s.
So, when the media now, in 2026, says, 'Iran', which one are they talking about?
Convenience in conversation in media hype- honestly it can get obnoxious when it gets sloppy, and mixes the two together, when issues arise over violence done upon the land that has nothing to do with the original story line and substantiation for dropping explosives on the land. Vacillating, might be another description. The original story was to push out a corrupt power base.
Apparently there are or were some Iranians that wanted Americans to performs actions to push out corruption in Iran or the 'Shia in the main regime'. It's not certain whether the overlay of the same people wanted exactly 100% of what transpired.
Ok, so now the timeline is getting more and more complex.
Inserting here, there are many camps, just like many philosophies in any other countries; everyone might be striving to be patriotic, but not all beliefs are the same.
Two camps regarding Iran, is used in this conversation, for the scope of this conversation.
Here is a progression of what could be, could-be developments, which might be explained by use of tiers as a word choice:
Tier 1, was at least the idea that there was, corruption in a regime, in this case, there was a concurring among multiple parties that there was or highly probable there was, corruption in a 'mainly Shia regime'; where a Shia regime without corruption, is what it is is, a functioning regime without corruption.
Tier 2- concerns about a regime that has a combination of corruption, and that it might be a potential danger to others in the way of carrying out violence in many different kinds of ways, (not just missiles or nuclear weapons).
In the list of others who they may be or were endangered, includes today's Israel, and, as various missile strikes have indicated, to other countries or nations in the Middle East as well, some of those other nations are mainly 'Muslim countries'.
Tier 3- the concept of nuclear weapons capability.
-Frankly, if an opinion can be dropped in here, anything nuclear is starting to move toward a thing of the past; sure, nuclear weapons are dangerous, but so too are cannonballs and bows and arrows. Cannonballs and arrows from bows, can be shot for miles at certain tech levels. But cannon balls and arrows are now seen as obviously in the days of antiquity, and no one is going to introduce a proposal or hold a speech on UN floor in 2026 rambling about the dangers of cannonballs.
How to develop a bow and arrow can probably be found online now, and any reasonably smart junior high school aged kid can build one.
Last checked in the past several years, in Japan, schools equip students as young as age 9 with the basics of understanding of some of the concepts of things nuclear. It's not because kids are being taught how to be weapon masterminds from school age, but because it's old tech, just like working a computer screen. Kids all around the world know they need to plug a keyboard into the computer, or use bluetooth technology, whatever, to type instructions into the computer, to affect what appears on the screen. 50 years ago, only a few persons even knew how to type.
Enough contrast painted, one of the salient questions that automatically crop up, is, is nuclear weapons capability really the issue with Iran? When, the real, or a real issue, is acting responsibly with weapons, any weapons, nuclear or whatever else, and not just Iran, everyone.
Tier 4- the regime. Which regime?
Tier 5- Iran; but which one?
Tier 6- starts moving into the hate to say it and gain a sense of what might be strongly possible, that developments might just start drifting to debilitating Iran, regardless of whether Shia, Sunni, act responsibly or don't act responsibly, corrupt or not corrupt.
Which then leads to, reiterated, where is the set of developments having to do with detonations being dropped on Iran, and Lebanon, and potentialities at least discussed of boots on the ground, headed to?
Where is it going?, and where do different people, groups, gangs, and other furtive collaborations (or think they're sneaky), trying to go?
The questions continue; if someone or 'someones' is trying to go to or get to a place, none of which has been talked about on policy pulpits, other that what's been or being talked about, why are they trying to get there?, what's their next phase and plan? Build a gigantic circus for decadent acts, with performers in purple polkadotted shorts running around?
---
Unfortunately, among a large part of media stories, and renown motor-mouths are expressing their hyped up positions about theoretical developments having to do with Iran and the Middle East, a large part of what's being and has been spoken so far, have very little to do with reality. Why is that?
The answer is people are planning weird stuff. Planning funding games, of course at the expense of innocent lives.
---
Contrary to certain types of propaganda, not everyone in the US agreed with the simplified idea of bombing Nagasaki and Hiroshima roughly 80 years ago. That means not everyone in the government, nor military, nor citizens, nor the aspects of the plan.
It might all be coming to a head real soon, and someone might have to draw a circle around the mashup spot where a lot of it meets up at, before Pandora's box releases a bunch of confusion.
There were some folks that came to the US back about the 1940s, especially WWI and WWII era, that were impactful in certain ways in developments that reference bomb development.
Some of those folks are from the very same region or close enough to, where some suspected activities mixed up in Epstein files are, 50 and 60 some odd years later.
Polish leadership is expressing disapproval at some of the plausible possibilities of the Epstein case.
Epstein case latter phase investigations, has some overlaps in the time, or is about concurrent to missiles dropped on Iran.
Missiles dropped on Iran aren't quite the same method as what happened in Nagasaki and Hiroshima 80 years ago.
Epstein case probably is not the only global level human trafficking involved case that exists.
It's a brass tacks situation, some of the kids that recently passed away have some of the same positive aspects as some of the kids that managed to survive in Japan about 80 years ago.
It may not be all of the story, rarely is something like that is. Pictures posted here, holding back. It may not be necessary.
Just like 80 years ago, political leaders, analysts of military strategies, religious leaders, are watching situations develop, and asking the straightforward questions, are certain moves, and extents of moves, especially of the violence sort, really the best move?
Words for the day, hubris, recklessness, greed, uninsightful while uninsightfully thought to be insightful, and possibly even, self-destructive.
---
Third entity?
