The insistence that weapons of mass destruction are set out at the forefront as primary priority above all else. 
Missiles have been reportedly fired on Iran over the past half day thereabout. Missiles have hit Dubai, it's not 100% certain where they came from at this very second.
There are reports of missiles landing on numerous targets.
The names and places in the exchange of firings are all too familiar, maybe even escalated replay, of what has been intermittently going on in about the last two years.
US, Israel, Iran, Dubai.

Big news outlets say it's mainly about the condition of nuclear arms Iran has, plus an expressed level a disinterest in the current regime of Iran, as the raison detre (d'être) for the missile strikes.

Honestly, hearts change when missiles get fired and they land. It's extremely rare that the only people that get hurt are 'intended' targets, like key weapons administrators or corrupt government officials.

A regime change is typically the behest when missiles land. 'Twas the case in other recent eras, such as Sdam Hsyn (Saddam Husein) of Iraq, or in the Vietnam War.

The title of the HCN previous post, exact wording does not matter much, was 'Paving the Way ... for Lower Standards or Decrease in Morality... and Increase in Debauchery'; when the thoughts were forming of what to say to report today's news, the title was looked at, and for a second there, the thought was nothing more needs to be said, the situation has already been addressed, (or just duplicate the story title), there's some more paving the way for debauchery and lack of morals going on. Who's doing it? Well let's let there conscience speak. Open-ended question, don't come attack me, as no fingers are being pointed. Somebody is doing something to pave the way for worse conditions somewhere down the line. The exact who, might not be readily ascertainable to everyone in the public, and the perpetrators might be a combination of people.

A regime change might occur after heavy missile firing, but is it really going to result in a real regime change in terms of who is directing different aspects of different attitudes?

Moreover, is the resentment of missile strikes, coming from all sides, neighbors and so on, going to be so intensified, that it just winds up with bunches of sour attitudes? 

People around the world are sick of the missile era we are in today. Missiles being fired doesn't have the same meaning as it did say 50 years ago, where it was a sign of the most severe form of message and strategy to bring about change. Sort of like cars, emails and computers. If 2 or 3 guys managed to get a hold of car and drive a few blocks to taunt someone over a social issue, no one cares as folks might have back in the day of Model-T Ford.

Many folks have been through this before. It's Ramadhan, fasting month, Markedly observed popularly by folks in the Middle East and from the Middle East, and missiles are being exchanged in the Middle East, among folks in the Middle East. So here we are, right about at the first 10 day mark, a month usually about 30 days, so the first third or 33.3%, mood says, whatever, and instead of heights of togetherness and seeking 'spiritual goals', Saturday morning media is rife with buildings gutted by fire. Absolutely disgusting.



--
Readers may want to consider minimum (close to boycott) click response on ads run online on stories covering the crisis. Forbidden to capitalize and make money off the woes of others.

--
Commentaries on the relatively recent Big Beautiful Bill, have glared at aspects pertaining to fight might. Depending on how the episode of missile exchanges go for roughly the next 24 hours, folks might be asking, are these events the the issue in unfolding on the practical payout level, what the punctuated spot was or is?

--
Pipe dream of Satan, disruption of calm and fiery scenes during Ramadhan right when the spring comes around after winter.