'Starting Something', Ghareeb, Strange. :Missile Strikes on Targets in Qatar. 2025.
Posted by HCN on Tuesday, September 9, 2025
Everyone on earth is not living inside the right and left of the brain of whoever went forward on to follow through or not follow through with a missile strike targeted to a location in a sovereign nation not their own.
As of right this moment 9/2025, it may not be widespread information to the public (yet) just where the physical point of emanation missiles came from that struck targets in Qatar over the past couple of days.
In some aspects, it might not matter all that much.
However there are other aspects where doors are open to serious issues.
If missiles were indeed 'from' Israel, there may be a 3 to 4 option list as to what may have occurred, in order for those missiles to be fired and land on the target.
Option 1- missiles fired from within the geographic confined of today's Israel boundaries (boundaries according to for instance, transnational entities that have certain recognition of nations a precursor to membership).
Option 2- missiles fired outside the above referenced boundaries.
2a- missiles emerged from another country on land
2b- missiles fired from sea, such as a warship
2c- missiles fired from a machine already in the land, in this case Qatar
2d- missiles fired from the air, which could be just like the above list, over Qatar, near Qatar, over water declared it undeclared, from over Israeli airspace, combination, unclear, or not applicable
Some of the above options could include missiles flying over or near the Kaaba and Prophet's Masjid and tomb, which according to the Muslim World, is about the furthest 'no no' one can possibly get.
No no basically in English refers to principles of risk and protection.
Issue/s #2:
If indeed the basic premise, which is what popular media is saying, is Israel is seeking out targets of the referent Hamas, both sides need to, if they haven't already (it's about rest assured they know this and more), recognize the humaneness, today's catchword, humanity, of flying missiles around. If you know you may be the highly potential target of a missile strike, why be in an area that you know if struck would endanger the area, the people, and trajectory of aerial weapons, in and around it?
More background:
Historically, say since about the 1940s, Israel or forces within it, have struck targets outside the Palestine/Israel landmass, for example, targets in Lebanon.
The 'organization' known today as Hamas, on a very basic level and linear historically timeline, was not there/here yet (back in the 1940s). The daily news stories rife in popular newspapers and radio from 1946 to 1956 were not necessarily 'Israel seeks Hamas targets'.
It may have been more, particular groups declaring to be acting on behalf of advancing certain plans targeted certain targets.
All said, the idea of following through on a vow of destroying any and all threats post the October 7 incident of a few years ago, may be something Israel or forces within it are doing, attempting to, highly considering based on calculations, etc., however again, what's going on in a particular entities brain or mind, is what's in their brain and mind. Just because that entity might assert something is justified based on their assessments and calculations, does not necessarily mean it's justified by everyone else in the world, which brings up another major issue and concern.
The line in the sand of how much is too much, and when going to far, such as in the efforts, statements for, or intentions of defense, protection, security, and revenge.
Israel, Palestine, Jerusalem, Gaza tensions, are not the only places in the world and its history where this subject matter has come up. Entire populations and towns have been wiped out the result of the backlash of an attack whether actual or perceived.
As of right this moment 9/2025, it may not be widespread information to the public (yet) just where the physical point of emanation missiles came from that struck targets in Qatar over the past couple of days.
In some aspects, it might not matter all that much.
However there are other aspects where doors are open to serious issues.
If missiles were indeed 'from' Israel, there may be a 3 to 4 option list as to what may have occurred, in order for those missiles to be fired and land on the target.
Option 1- missiles fired from within the geographic confined of today's Israel boundaries (boundaries according to for instance, transnational entities that have certain recognition of nations a precursor to membership).
Option 2- missiles fired outside the above referenced boundaries.
2a- missiles emerged from another country on land
2b- missiles fired from sea, such as a warship
2c- missiles fired from a machine already in the land, in this case Qatar
2d- missiles fired from the air, which could be just like the above list, over Qatar, near Qatar, over water declared it undeclared, from over Israeli airspace, combination, unclear, or not applicable
Some of the above options could include missiles flying over or near the Kaaba and Prophet's Masjid and tomb, which according to the Muslim World, is about the furthest 'no no' one can possibly get.
No no basically in English refers to principles of risk and protection.
Issue/s #2:
If indeed the basic premise, which is what popular media is saying, is Israel is seeking out targets of the referent Hamas, both sides need to, if they haven't already (it's about rest assured they know this and more), recognize the humaneness, today's catchword, humanity, of flying missiles around. If you know you may be the highly potential target of a missile strike, why be in an area that you know if struck would endanger the area, the people, and trajectory of aerial weapons, in and around it?
More background:
Historically, say since about the 1940s, Israel or forces within it, have struck targets outside the Palestine/Israel landmass, for example, targets in Lebanon.
The 'organization' known today as Hamas, on a very basic level and linear historically timeline, was not there/here yet (back in the 1940s). The daily news stories rife in popular newspapers and radio from 1946 to 1956 were not necessarily 'Israel seeks Hamas targets'.
It may have been more, particular groups declaring to be acting on behalf of advancing certain plans targeted certain targets.
All said, the idea of following through on a vow of destroying any and all threats post the October 7 incident of a few years ago, may be something Israel or forces within it are doing, attempting to, highly considering based on calculations, etc., however again, what's going on in a particular entities brain or mind, is what's in their brain and mind. Just because that entity might assert something is justified based on their assessments and calculations, does not necessarily mean it's justified by everyone else in the world, which brings up another major issue and concern.
The line in the sand of how much is too much, and when going to far, such as in the efforts, statements for, or intentions of defense, protection, security, and revenge.
Israel, Palestine, Jerusalem, Gaza tensions, are not the only places in the world and its history where this subject matter has come up. Entire populations and towns have been wiped out the result of the backlash of an attack whether actual or perceived.
