Does Increase of Complexity Equal Increase Attempts at Marketing Jokes? When Genocide.
Posted by HCN on Thursday, April 2, 2026
Marketing a joke, or selling a joke, has to do with the saying 'buying a joke'. Whoever produced the joke, is trying to get others to buy the joke.
That's set one of the joke issue.
Set two, is, some people must really think that everyone else in the world, estimated if 8.5 billion people live on the planet, about eight billion, four hundred ninety-nine million, nine hundred ninety-nine thousand people (leaving a remainder rough estimate of about a 1000 perpetrators; of course, the application to whatever the exact population is, is, minus a 1000, whether it be 8.3 or 8.35, or whatever, in April 2026,) must either be a joke, or their minds are so easily deceived by jokes their minds must be jokes.
Yes, it's disrespectful.
The referent '1000', probably cannot even see how far out their own mind they are to see how disrespectful to the point of lunacy they have gotten.
At extreme illustration, it is very difficult to engineer a war by asserting that 2+2 = 5 or 6, or 500, or 5,000. This no matter how many math certifications the engineer has. People are not buying it.
There could be several engineers strewn all over the earth working together, to build a bonfire of chaos; one engineer says 2+2=5, another says 2+2=6, another says 3+3=7. So does several wrong engineers make a right? Still no.
Perpetrators discussed here are typically people given to pedophilia, and genocide with no remorse.
Afterword
It might make it easier to get more clarity on what this discussion is talking about to mention a few more words.
The points in this discussion apply to many developments, and other times.
Today, first week of April 2026, heaven forbid any further wild and wacky atrocity, especially at the hands of perpetrators before this week ends, it is pretty obvious that some of the perpetrators are members of some of the media.
If 20% of the world's oil is dependent on travelling through point 'x', then the impact should be 20% of the world's oil supply, maybe add another 10% due to hype and overreaction. 20 plus 10 is 30, how does 30% act like it's affecting 99% of the world's oil supply?
Sing songs on news media for 45 minutes trying to get people to buy it.
Some of those people doing that time wasting ditziness, are being sued and put out there for contributing to genocide.
That's set one of the joke issue.
Set two, is, some people must really think that everyone else in the world, estimated if 8.5 billion people live on the planet, about eight billion, four hundred ninety-nine million, nine hundred ninety-nine thousand people (leaving a remainder rough estimate of about a 1000 perpetrators; of course, the application to whatever the exact population is, is, minus a 1000, whether it be 8.3 or 8.35, or whatever, in April 2026,) must either be a joke, or their minds are so easily deceived by jokes their minds must be jokes.
Yes, it's disrespectful.
The referent '1000', probably cannot even see how far out their own mind they are to see how disrespectful to the point of lunacy they have gotten.
At extreme illustration, it is very difficult to engineer a war by asserting that 2+2 = 5 or 6, or 500, or 5,000. This no matter how many math certifications the engineer has. People are not buying it.
There could be several engineers strewn all over the earth working together, to build a bonfire of chaos; one engineer says 2+2=5, another says 2+2=6, another says 3+3=7. So does several wrong engineers make a right? Still no.
Perpetrators discussed here are typically people given to pedophilia, and genocide with no remorse.
Afterword
It might make it easier to get more clarity on what this discussion is talking about to mention a few more words.
The points in this discussion apply to many developments, and other times.
Today, first week of April 2026, heaven forbid any further wild and wacky atrocity, especially at the hands of perpetrators before this week ends, it is pretty obvious that some of the perpetrators are members of some of the media.
If 20% of the world's oil is dependent on travelling through point 'x', then the impact should be 20% of the world's oil supply, maybe add another 10% due to hype and overreaction. 20 plus 10 is 30, how does 30% act like it's affecting 99% of the world's oil supply?
Sing songs on news media for 45 minutes trying to get people to buy it.
Some of those people doing that time wasting ditziness, are being sued and put out there for contributing to genocide.
